Hello,
for the figure below I try to justify the reflection mapping. They say that e1−>T(e1) is described by a mapping [cos(2θ)sin(2θ)]. I can get to the same result by drawing a parpendicular from T(e1) to the X axis and then write simple trigonometry formula for cosine rx=cos(2θ)−>x=rcos(2θ) where 'r' is the length of the vector (here r = 1 since e1 is a basis vector). Similarly for the sine function I get the expected transformation. However I can't get the tranformation for e2. Since the angle is obtuse I was thinking about first writing the transformation of e2 on the X axis and lateer from X to T(e2). But since we don't know the angles I have no idea how to do this.

Thanks!
for the figure below I try to justify the reflection mapping. They say that e1−>T(e1) is described by a mapping [cos(2θ)sin(2θ)]. I can get to the same result by drawing a parpendicular from T(e1) to the X axis and then write simple trigonometry formula for cosine rx=cos(2θ)−>x=rcos(2θ) where 'r' is the length of the vector (here r = 1 since e1 is a basis vector). Similarly for the sine function I get the expected transformation. However I can't get the tranformation for e2. Since the angle is obtuse I was thinking about first writing the transformation of e2 on the X axis and lateer from X to T(e2). But since we don't know the angles I have no idea how to do this.

Thanks!