Set theory

TinaW

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2020
Messages
5
Hi, I am in a bit of situation, professor is refusing to give us results and im quite sure that i got less points than should have. Please could somebody check few of the questions (ill post them separately as per rules) and see if i did correct solution?

Capture11.PNG
Capture22.PNG
Capture22a.PNG
 

Attachments

  • Capture11a.PNG
    Capture11a.PNG
    346.9 KB · Views: 2
(a) You didn't use the specific definitions of the sets. This is not a generic question about any three sets.

(b) Your explanation is missing something.

(c) Okay

(d) You're probably right, but if I were required to base my answer only on what we are explicitly told, I might say "insufficient data". I could say the same about (b) and (c), since we aren't told that "aardvark" is in the dictionary ...

(e, f) I think you are supposed to explain in terms of the dictionary and the definitions you were given: "words that ..."

(g) Your reasoning is not stated fully, but you are right.
 
(a) You didn't use the specific definitions of the sets. This is not a generic question about any three sets.

(b) Your explanation is missing something.

(c) Okay

(d) You're probably right, but if I were required to base my answer only on what we are explicitly told, I might say "insufficient data". I could say the same about (b) and (c), since we aren't told that "aardvark" is in the dictionary ...

(e, f) I think you are supposed to explain in terms of the dictionary and the definitions you were given: "words that ..."

(g) Your reasoning is not stated fully, but you are right.


In questions a)b)c)d) We were only supposed to state whether statement is true or false, explanations are there on my part only.
a) I explained why i think this statement is false (because of definitions of the sets..)
 
In questions a)b)c)d) We were only supposed to state whether statement is true or false, explanations are there on my part only.
a) I explained why i think this statement is false (because of definitions of the sets..)

No, (a) is true! THINK! What is the union of A and B, actually, in this specific case?

You reasoned from your Venn diagram, which doesn't reflect the reality of these sets.
 
Union of A and B are all the words that appear before the dog, and all the words that appear after the cat. C are all the words that have two identical consecutive letters.

Question: is a C subset of union of A and B?

A set is a subset of a set if all of its members are also members of superset. Because not all words that have two identical consecutive letters also go before dog and after cat, so that statement is false. I could be wrong, but im pretty sure its false.
 
a) In any dictionary, every word is either before dog or after cat.
b) The word aardvark is not after cat and has a double letter.
c) the set \(B\Delta C\) is call a symmetric difference and equals \((B\cap C^c)\cup(C\cap B^c)\).
d) The word cow \(\in A\cap B\)
 
Union of A and B are all the words that appear before the dog, and all the words that appear after the cat. C are all the words that have two identical consecutive letters.

Question: is a C subset of union of A and B?

A set is a subset of a set if all of its members are also members of superset. Because not all words that have two identical consecutive letters also go before dog and after cat, so that statement is false. I could be wrong, but im pretty sure its false.
As pka pointed out, A∪B consists of all words that are either before dog or after cat, which is the entire dictionary. If a word is not before dog, it is after cat. So any subset of the dictionary, such as C, is a subset of A∪B.

In your (correct) Venn diagram, the bottom part (C only) is empty. The Venn diagram doesn't show this (unless you mark it to show such facts).

The error in your statement is "go before dog and after cat". That would be the intersection, not the union. Your first paragraph had it right, so I'm not sure where your thinking went wrong; but it is common to get confused over "and", forgetting that while the union consists of all elements of A and all elements of B, combined, each individual element of the union is in either A or B (or both), not in both A and B.
 
Union of A and B are all the words that appear before the dog, and all the words that appear after the cat. C are all the words that have two identical consecutive letters. Question: is a C subset of union of A and B?
A set is a subset of a set if all of its members are also members of superset. Because not all words that have two identical consecutive letters also go before dog and after cat, so that statement is false. I could be wrong, but im pretty sure its false.
You have told twice that \(A\cup B\) is the set of all words in the dictionary.
Consider the mathematical equivalent: \((-\infty,1)\cup(-1,\infty)\equiv\mathbb{R}\).
That is to say that every real number \(x\) is grater that \(-1\) or less than \(1\).
Here is another observation: \(D=A\cap B\). like \((-\infty,1)\cap(-1,\infty)=(-1,1)\).
 
Top