Iceycold12
Junior Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Messages
- 55
Just need to make sure my notes are correct.
We know that if we get |-3x| = 18 we split that into -3x = 18 or -3x = -18. Then solve and get two solutions.
However, if we get say 5|y+3|<15 (Note it's not an equal sign now but an inequality sign). We divide by 5 to get abs value alone, so y+3 < 15 or y + 3 >-15. Now that's where I get confused. Do we solve it by solving these two: y+3<15 or y+3>-15 and getting two solutions or putting it in this form: -15 < y+3 < 15 which solved equals -> -18<y<12. The original equations is in |x|< a form. The solved form of -a < x < a I got form purple math:
If I need to solve an abs value inequality in |x| > a form, I split it into two, like it says here:
Basically, the point of my post is to make sure I've taken my notes correctly: For abs value equations |x| = a I answer it with "or" with 2 solutions. For abs value inequalities in |x| < a form, I answer in -a < x < a form.
And lastly in |x| > a form, I answer with 2 solutions using "or" the same as abs value equations basically.
We know that if we get |-3x| = 18 we split that into -3x = 18 or -3x = -18. Then solve and get two solutions.
However, if we get say 5|y+3|<15 (Note it's not an equal sign now but an inequality sign). We divide by 5 to get abs value alone, so y+3 < 15 or y + 3 >-15. Now that's where I get confused. Do we solve it by solving these two: y+3<15 or y+3>-15 and getting two solutions or putting it in this form: -15 < y+3 < 15 which solved equals -> -18<y<12. The original equations is in |x|< a form. The solved form of -a < x < a I got form purple math:
This pattern for "less than" absolute-value inequalities always holds: Given the inequality | x | < a, the solution is always of the form –a < x < a. Even when the exercises get more complicated, the pattern still holds. Copyright © Elizabeth Stapel 2000-2011 All Rights Reserved
- Solve | 2x + 3 | < 6.Since this is a "less than" absolute-value inequality, the first step is to clear the absolute value according to the pattern. Then I'll solve the linear inequality.
Then the solution to | 2x + 3 | < 6 is the interval –9/2 < x < 3/2.
- | 2x + 3 | < 6
–6 < 2x + 3 < 6 [this is the pattern for "less than"]
–6 – 3 < 2x + 3 – 3 < 6 – 3
–9 < 2x < 3
–9/2 < x < 3/2
If I need to solve an abs value inequality in |x| > a form, I split it into two, like it says here:
The pattern for "greater than" absolute-value inequalities always holds: the solution is always in two parts. Given the inequality | x | > a, the solution always starts by splitting the inequality into two pieces:x < –a or x > a. For instance:
- Solve | 2x – 3 | > 5.The first thing to do is clear the absolute value bars by splitting the inequality into two. Then I'll solve the two linear inequalities.
This PAIR of inequalities is the solution;
- | 2x – 3 | > 5
2x – 3 < –5 or 2x – 3 > 5 [this is the pattern for "greater than"]
2x < –2 or 2x > 8
x < –1 or x > 4
the solution to | 2x – 3 | > 5 consists of the two intervals x < –1 and x > 4.
Basically, the point of my post is to make sure I've taken my notes correctly: For abs value equations |x| = a I answer it with "or" with 2 solutions. For abs value inequalities in |x| < a form, I answer in -a < x < a form.
And lastly in |x| > a form, I answer with 2 solutions using "or" the same as abs value equations basically.
Last edited: