# Activity Stream

• Today, 05:39 PM
As I understand it, the sum you are interested in is not really the geometric series, but the sum of its terms after rounding. (Rounded to the...
2 replies | 38 view(s)
• Today, 02:46 PM
It is a difficult question to discuss when one doesn't really have the vocabulary or experience to discuss it. Let's see how far we can get... ...
2 replies | 38 view(s)
• Today, 01:47 PM
Dr.Peterson replied to a thread 1.09 * 1.09 by hand in Arithmetic
In case the answers you have seen don't make it clear, your error was that you multiplied 1.09 * 9.09 rather than 1.09 * 1.09. An important skill...
3 replies | 61 view(s)
• Today, 01:37 PM
Jeff's 67K: DAY INTEREST BALANCE 0 300.00 1 4.48 304.48 2 4.55 309.02 3 4.61 313.64 4 4.68 ...
4 replies | 195 view(s)
• Today, 01:07 PM
Denis replied to a thread 1.09 * 1.09 by hand in Arithmetic
Well, multiply 109 * 109, then insert the decimal point :rolleyes:
3 replies | 61 view(s)
• Today, 12:25 PM
Good. Of course, the important thing (beyond my having gotten the numbers right) is that you have the idea for other conversions. This was a...
7 replies | 199 view(s)
• Today, 12:22 PM
so here is my situation. I have a number that , let's call it A, and I need to determine base of the exponent in a geometric series (see...
2 replies | 38 view(s)
• Today, 11:48 AM
Air at 15 degrees C and sea level has a density of 1.225 kg/m3. So, V is 175(1/1.225)**0.43 = 160.376 m/s. Converting the density results in an...
7 replies | 199 view(s)
• Today, 11:27 AM
Ok, I gained some insight, i used the quadratic formula for both of those, and the answers I got is the limits for the ranges of x, but my only...
2 replies | 91 view(s)
• Today, 10:39 AM
ver = ver(y) trim : why not "very short"? tigo = tailess tigo(n)
4 replies | 138 view(s)
• Today, 07:41 AM
xx1.09 xx1.09 ---------- xx981 x0000 10900 ------- 1.1881
3 replies | 61 view(s)
• Today, 04:56 AM
pc510 started a thread 1.09 * 1.09 by hand in Arithmetic
Hi everyone, I am trying to multiply 1.09 * 1.09 by hand and I am not getting it. Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong in the calculation? ...
3 replies | 61 view(s)
• Today, 02:57 AM
Oh, good. No need for parametric equations, then.
3 replies | 124 view(s)
• Today, 02:46 AM
The French side of green tea boxes say VERT, so I had always thought it meant green tea in French. (I lived in British Columbia for a couple years,...
4 replies | 138 view(s)
• Today, 02:17 AM
Thanks for your reply, and yes of course this is hypothetical :D. The $65 is a daily average, including losing days, and is based on daily average... 5 replies | 213 view(s) • Today, 01:08 AM Also, how did you get to the$67k result from daily reinvestment? $1.50 per 10megaH.$300 initial investment, comes out to 2terraH. Add...
4 replies | 195 view(s)
• Today, 01:02 AM
When I first saw bitcoins they were $8 a piece. I thought, nobody would buy those! Today, they hit$20,000 a piece. Apparently someone bought...
4 replies | 195 view(s)
• Yesterday, 11:12 PM
Thanks for the reply, yes, I'm using windows, will try chopping it down when I get back after the Christmas break. In the meantine, Merry...
9 replies | 469 view(s)
• Yesterday, 10:36 PM
Okay thanks a lot for all your help, I'm truly grateful :o
13 replies | 539 view(s)
• Yesterday, 10:13 PM
Thanks! This makes sense.
6 replies | 169 view(s)
• Yesterday, 09:26 PM
Try arbitrary values. Maybe a, b, c, and d.
13 replies | 539 view(s)
• Yesterday, 09:23 PM
Too late. We already minded. Good work.
7 replies | 292 view(s)
More Activity