Quadratic Inequalities and fractional inequalities

candy101

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
43
hello guys i am having trouble with these problem


Quadratic Inequalities and fractional inequalities
(i know how to solve it just don't really understand how to do the chart)


i basically know that with the Quadratic Inequalities i have to set it to a Quadratic equation and set it to 0
but then i have to draw a chart that's where i am having the problem...
i dont need to get the ans. just like if its positive or negative

like this one
3x^2+4x?7
so the ans. turn out to be x=1 and x=-7/3
now i have to draw a chart with 5 column
and see if its positive or negative

any ideas?
 
To learn the general method, try this online lesson. :wink:

I don't know what "chart" you're talking about, nor what might go into the five columns, so I can't comment on that. Sorry! :oops:
 
Hello, candy101!

Someone is teaaching you a long and complicated method . . .


\(\displaystyle 3x^2 + 4x \:\geq\:7\)

We have: .\(\displaystyle 3x^2 + 4x - 7 \:\geq \:0\)

The graph of: \(\displaystyle y \:=\:3x^2 + 4x - 7\) is an up-opening parabola.
It is positive on the "outside" of its x-intercepts.

It looks something like this:


Code:
            |
   *        |            *
            |
    *       |           *
     *      |          *
       *    |        *
  - - - - o + - - o - - - - -
            | *
            |

\(\displaystyle \text{Find the }x\text{-intercepts.}\)

\(\displaystyle \text{We have: }\:3x^2 - 4x - 7 \:=\:0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad (x+1)(3x-7) \:=\:0\)

. . \(\displaystyle \text{Hence: }\:x \,=\,-1,\;x\,=\,\tfrac{7}{3}\)


\(\displaystyle \text{Therefore, the solution is: }\;\;(x\,<\,-1) \cup \left(x\,>\,\tfrac{7}{3}\right)\;\;\text{ or }\;\;(-\infty,-1) \cup \left(\tfrac{7}{3},\infty\right)\)

 
ok i got the quadratic inequalities
but what are fractional inequalities?? can u like give me the basic explanation of what it is..


thanks,
 
candy101 said:
ok i got the quadratic inequalities
but what are fractional inequalities?? can u like give me the basic explanation of what it is..


thanks,

What does your textbook/class-notes say?
 
candy101 said:
what are fractional inequalities?? can u like give me the basic explanation of what it is.
If you mean "rational" inequalities, then try here. :wink:
 
Fractional inequalites can be turned into quadratic or linear ones.
It requires care to do so though.

You have to "keep an eye out" for the possibilty of
multiplying or dividing by a negative number (the variable x can be + or -).

This is irrelevent for "equalities" since if x = 5 then -x = -5
but if x > 5 then -x < -5 ( 6>5 but -6<-5 as it's a lower temperature).

In the quadratic case you see where the graph (or chart) is above and below the x axis.
You see that nicely illustrated by Soroban.

In the rational case, you must carefully rearrange it if you have to.
How would we go from -x>7 to x<-7 ?
If we change the sign, we are in fact multiplying or dividing by -1.
If we do that without reversing the inequality, then we have gone wrong.

Of course, you can avoid that also by simply adding and subtracting terms from
both sides of the inequality in non-rational cases.
When you have x under the line in an inequality fraction, be careful about multiplying by x
due to what is mentioned.

Here is an example 2/x + x/3 > -4
2/x is asymptotic and x/3 is a line.
Their values are negative when x<0 and positive when x>0,
2/x has no value that we can define when x is zero,
because it starts "shooting for the stars" as it gets near zero, it evades us.

The sum of the fractions is negative only when x is negative,
positive only when x is positive. So, the sum is >-4 for x>0 and some negative x possibly.
Even though 2/x is undefined at x=0, you could say it's infinite and has to be >0.
If you choose to multiply both sides by x, you have 2 cases....
If x is negative, we reverse the inequality,
if not we don't so you could proceed to examine both cases.

It turns that if we imagine x is positive, our solutions for x are both negative
for the resulting quadratic x[sup:2oy0auit]2[/sup:2oy0auit] +12x +6 = 0.
If you then say the answers correspond to the range of x that make this >0
you'd be wrong!! If you sketch the curve, you'd notice the graph >0 for x< about -11 and x > about -1/2.
But we know that values of x much more negative than this will cause the initial sum
of two fractions to be much less than -4.

What you'd in fact have to do is begin with 2/x + x/3 >-4 so 2/x + x/3 + 4 >0
Now you should write....
if x is negative, then 2 + (x[sup:2oy0auit]2[/sup:2oy0auit])/3 + 4x <0
if x is positive, then 2 + (x[sup:2oy0auit]2[/sup:2oy0auit])/3 + 4x >0

So if x is negative, you can multiply both sides by x "while reversing the inequality".
You just need to "account for" x being + or -
and check the solutions you get, as they must be + if x should be +
and - if x should be -

therefore you are looking for the solutions of x[sup:2oy0auit]2[/sup:2oy0auit] + 12x + 6 < 0 for negative x
which is the "cup" part of the graph under the x axis
and x[sup:2oy0auit]2[/sup:2oy0auit] + 12x + 6 > 0 for positive x which is the "branch" extending from the y axis crossing point at y = 6
As that curve is U-shaped, it is >0 when x is positive for all x>=0.
It's also + for x < about -11 or so but x cannot be - for this part of the solution.

It takes a bit of getting used to but it's worth the effort.

Sorry, I have no graphs, I need to figure out how to include them here (.pdf files won't upload).
 
i am doing this and just want to make sure im on the right track

4x^2?7-3x
what i did was

move the 7-3x over to the left side
getting

4x^2-7+3x=0
im not sure if i moves the right side over

then i did the quadratic formula

getting these answers : x= -3/2, -4/2
 
candy101 said:
i am doing this and just want to make sure im on the right track

4x^2?7-3x
what i did was

move the 7-3x over to the left side
getting

4x^2-7+3x ? 0

y = (4x + 7)(x -1) ? 0

if x ? -7/4 ? y ? 0

if -7/4 ? x ? 1 ? y ? 0

if x ? 1 ? y ? 0

From the above information you can form your chart


im not sure if i moves the right side over

then i did the quadratic formula

getting these answers : x= -3/2, -4/2
 
Hi Candy,

have you completed the work on your original one
3x[sup:2qj6b33x]2[/sup:2qj6b33x]+4x>7?

The same procedure solves 4x[sup:2qj6b33x]2[/sup:2qj6b33x]>7-3x

Just subtract 7-3x from both sides to get 4x[sup:2qj6b33x]2[/sup:2qj6b33x]+3x-7>0

Write as a multiplication (factorise it) as Subhotosh and Soroban showed.

{4x+7}{x-1}>0

Since the graph looks like Soroban's, this is zero when x=-7/4 and when x=1,
therefore it's >0 when x is -7/4 or to the left of -7/4, ie x<-7/4
and when x>1

In between those two, the function is <0

The answers to this are the answers to 4x[sup:2qj6b33x]2[/sup:2qj6b33x]>7-3x.

Or, negative times negative is positive,
so 4x+7 and x-1 are both positive when x>1
and both negative when 4x<-7 ie when x<-7/4
if you want to answer it "non-graphically".

You can move "either" side over,
as you say you did not know if you moved the "right" (proper) side over.
The idea is "If the two sides are the same, subtracting them gives zero".
You can subtract the right from the left or the left from the right.

It's just convenient to have the x[sup:2qj6b33x]2[/sup:2qj6b33x] part positive.

You definately did not use the quadratic formula correctly though!
(I refer to it as "the abc formula").
If you are not used to factorising, use that as it will give you the same answers,
but you must understand that that formula will give you the answers that make 4x[sup:2qj6b33x]2[/sup:2qj6b33x]+3x-7 equal to zero
and you are looking for ranges of x that make it >0.
Here "a"=4, "b"=3 and "c"=-7.

Suppose your answers are "s" and "t" from the quadratic formula.
Then you have 4(x-s)(x-t) = 4x[sup:2qj6b33x]2[/sup:2qj6b33x]+3x-7.
This is because only x=s and x=t cause that to be zero,
the factorised one being the non-factorised one but now the answers are clear.

This is >0 for (x-s) and (x-t) both >0 or both <0
 
Top