Rome_Leader
New member
- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 4
After some simplification work, I've reduced a lengthy expression, which I won't re-type, to:
((p' & q') or (p & r')) or q or r
Where p' = not(p) and so on.
I'm unsure where to go from here. Expanding it only seems to make it worse, and none of my library of identities/equivalencies have helped. Can anyone point me in the direction of the simplest approach?
((p' & q') or (p & r')) or q or r
Where p' = not(p) and so on.
I'm unsure where to go from here. Expanding it only seems to make it worse, and none of my library of identities/equivalencies have helped. Can anyone point me in the direction of the simplest approach?