Help finding formula for zscore spreadsheet

johnlocke3

New member
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
1
Hello, I was looking for a little help with a spreadsheet I was trying to recreate using zscores. This sheet was used to judge defenses in basketball, but I am having a tough time figuring out what the original creator used to make the calculations. I understand how to get the means and S.D. for the columns listed, and the zscore for (raw z-FG%). But under z-FG% (last column) it looks like he may have used several sources of data to come up with the answers. So, I'm looking for the formula used to calculate z-FG% of 0.4 for row team A. I hope I am posting this in the right spot! Thanks

teamOpp FG%raw z-FG%Opp FGAFGA as % of meanz-FG%
A45.20.582.698.10%0.4
B44.5084.199.90%0
C45.50.688.5105.10%0.7
D44.2-0.283.999.60%-0.2
E42.9-1.185.9102.00%-1.1
F45.10.483.298.80%0.4
G45.90.983.499.00%0.9
H45.90.983.699.30%0.9
I44.80.283.398.90%0.2
J43.1-0.984.6100.50%-0.9
K43.3-0.890106.90%-0.9
L41.1-2.283.699.30%-2.2
M42.8-1.183.198.70%-1.1
44.3-0.182.197.50%-0.1
44.4-0.180.395.40%-0.1
44.4-0.181.897.10%-0.1
43.8-0.581.496.70%-0.5
46.71.488.1104.60%1.5
44-0.385.4101.40%-0.3
45.40.683.398.90%0.6
44.1-0.388104.50%-0.3
46.71.481.296.40%1.4
43.6-0.684.2100.00%-0.6
43.2-0.986.2102.40%-0.9
46.31.287.6104.00%1.2
46.91.687.2103.60%1.6
45.80.884.199.90%0.8
46.71.483.198.70%1.4
40.8-2.479.394.20%-2.3
44-0.382.998.50%-0.3
Means:44.584.2
Standard Deviations:1.52.5
 
Hello, I was looking for a little help with a spreadsheet I was trying to recreate using zscores. This sheet was used to judge defenses in basketball, but I am having a tough time figuring out what the original creator used to make the calculations. I understand how to get the means and S.D. for the columns listed, and the zscore for (raw z-FG%). But under z-FG% (last column) it looks like he may have used several sources of data to come up with the answers. So, I'm looking for the formula used to calculate z-FG% of 0.4 for row team A. I hope I am posting this in the right spot! Thanks

teamOpp FG%raw z-FG%Opp FGAFGA as % of meanz-FG%
A45.20.582.698.10%0.4
B44.5084.199.90%0
C45.50.688.5105.10%0.7
D44.2-0.283.999.60%-0.2
E42.9-1.185.9102.00%-1.1
F45.10.483.298.80%0.4
G45.90.983.499.00%0.9
H45.90.983.699.30%0.9
I44.80.283.398.90%0.2
J43.1-0.984.6100.50%-0.9
K43.3-0.890106.90%-0.9
L41.1-2.283.699.30%-2.2
M42.8-1.183.198.70%-1.1
44.3-0.182.197.50%-0.1
44.4-0.180.395.40%-0.1
44.4-0.181.897.10%-0.1
43.8-0.581.496.70%-0.5
46.71.488.1104.60%1.5
44-0.385.4101.40%-0.3
45.40.683.398.90%0.6
44.1-0.388104.50%-0.3
46.71.481.296.40%1.4
43.6-0.684.2100.00%-0.6
43.2-0.986.2102.40%-0.9
46.31.287.6104.00%1.2
46.91.687.2103.60%1.6
45.80.884.199.90%0.8
46.71.483.198.70%1.4
40.8-2.479.394.20%-2.3
44-0.382.998.50%-0.3
Means:44.584.2
Standard Deviations:1.52.5
If I'm understanding you correctly, the raw score Zr (raw z-FG%) is what is measured. This is turned into a (standard) score Z (z-FG%) by
Z = \(\displaystyle \frac{Z_r\, -\, \mu}{\sigma}\)

Just based on the two scores, a (close to) best fit for \(\displaystyle \mu\) and \(\displaystyle \sigma\) appears to be \(\displaystyle \mu\) = 0, \(\displaystyle \sigma\) = 1.

EDIT:As a pragmatic view of the differences, there may be some round off errors. Suppose that first pair of Zr and Z was supposed to be 0.45 and the person filling out the 'raw' colume rounded up to 0.5 and the person filling out the 'standard' column rounded down to 0.4.
 
Last edited:
Top