If I have a point estimator rule of (1/2)(Xsub1 + Xsub2) and I want to find the bias of an exponential distribution, I use
E(theta hat) - theta
E((1/2)(Xsub1 + Xsub2)) - theta = 0
So bias = 0.
Since Xsub1 and Xsub2 are 2 separate samples, why can I equate both to theta? Can't my point estimator change resulting in 2 different thetas?
...sorry for my lack of latex, that comes later this semester
E(theta hat) - theta
E((1/2)(Xsub1 + Xsub2)) - theta = 0
So bias = 0.
Since Xsub1 and Xsub2 are 2 separate samples, why can I equate both to theta? Can't my point estimator change resulting in 2 different thetas?
...sorry for my lack of latex, that comes later this semester