Tab Content
• 11-15-2017, 04:33 AM
Hi zeeskeys, If you could take \epsilon=0, then f(x)=x would be one-to-one and onto. In essence, you must prove that, by taking \epsilon small...
1 replies | 113 view(s)
• 11-11-2017, 09:11 AM
Well, that's a good point. To do that, we would need an estimate of the probability of vacancy in each prison. As such information was not...
3 replies | 274 view(s)
• 11-08-2017, 09:18 AM
You should look at the probabilty of "bad luck", i. e., the probability that all the 10 numbers are above 22. If that probability is p, the...
3 replies | 274 view(s)
• 11-07-2017, 10:15 AM
Hi Aemilius, There are various ways to definie the real numbers axiomatically. However, as far as I know, all these definitions include the field...
1 replies | 127 view(s)
• 11-07-2017, 09:51 AM
Hi ksdhart2, I notice that this question has been left unanswered for some time, and I don't know if you are still interested in the answer....
1 replies | 287 view(s)
• 11-05-2017, 09:28 AM
Hi malakai456, If, for example, B and C are invertible, then, by definition, they have inverses B^{-1} and C^{-1} (after all, that is what...
1 replies | 221 view(s)
• 11-05-2017, 05:15 AM
The result would be the same, as you would expect. There are three possible orderings for the outcome. If the coin is good, you will have a...
2 replies | 229 view(s)
• 11-04-2017, 10:10 AM
Hi sunrae, You are almost there ! You have (correctly) written: \displaystyle a_n = 2a_{n-1} + b_{n-1} + c_{n-1} You also know that:...
1 replies | 174 view(s)
No More Results
About barrick

#### Basic Information

##### About barrick
Biography:
Electronics Engineer
Location:
Brussels, Belgium
Occupation:
IT Project Manager (retired)

Total Posts
8
Posts Per Day
0.44
Last Activity
Today 05:38 AM
Join Date
11-04-2017
Referrals
0