Tab Content
• Yesterday, 11:01 PM
mmm4444bot replied to a thread Gambling Phrase in Arithmetic
4 replies | 104 view(s)
• Yesterday, 10:57 PM
Actually, it says clearly that the wife will get and the husband will get. Hasn't happened, yet. The agreement is in progress. There's also no...
12 replies | 210 view(s)
• Yesterday, 10:36 PM
Yes, I see that in your post now. Thanks. I'll probably ponder your question again, tomorrow. Gotta go root for the Huskies. :cool:
9 replies | 159 view(s)
• Yesterday, 10:28 PM
That's not the case, so there's no need to apologize. :) Subhotosh asked for context because there are not only different approaches available for...
9 replies | 159 view(s)
• Yesterday, 10:21 PM
I've never done an earnest study of math, other than in school. Are you asking about undergraduate texts? (I'm not sure what you mean by 'pure'). ...
11 replies | 277 view(s)
• Yesterday, 02:45 AM
I don't think you have enough information. The angular diameter isn't really useful, unless you have either the distance or the real diameter. ...
9 replies | 159 view(s)
• Yesterday, 01:06 AM
I knew that you could do it! :cool:
12 replies | 210 view(s)
• Yesterday, 12:58 AM
Correct. This means that each party needs to end up with a net gain of $3000 because that's half. Let's check that, to see whether her net gain... 12 replies | 210 view(s) • Yesterday, 12:37 AM I would revisit that calculation. Before anything happens, there are two$10,000 cars and one $14000 debt. How much value is that combined? Now,... 12 replies | 210 view(s) • Yesterday, 12:26 AM Each package contains 14 cards. If Bob bought 1 package, he would have 14 cards. If Bob bought 2 packages, he would have 28 cards. If Bob... 4 replies | 123 view(s) • Yesterday, 12:14 AM Are you representing the husband? ;) She loses$2,000. Does the husband also lose \$2,000? If he doesn't, then it's not an equitable distribution. ...
12 replies | 210 view(s)
• 11-17-2017, 11:52 PM
1 × 1 = 1 1 × 1¼ = 1¼ 1 × 2 = 2 1 × 2½ = 2½ 1 × 3 = 3
4 replies | 123 view(s)
• 11-17-2017, 06:06 AM
Disclaimer: I've been enjoying my wine, so keep that in mind below. Regularly! And, the deeper I think about the phenomenon itself, the sooner...
11 replies | 277 view(s)
• 11-17-2017, 04:45 AM
As Jeff pointed out, working with prime factorizations of numbers makes certain tasks in arithmetic easier. Do you remember that you need a common...
5 replies | 121 view(s)
• 11-16-2017, 07:26 AM
Will you please double-check your typing, to confirm that you typed what you were given? If you did, I think the exercise contains a mistake...
3 replies | 100 view(s)
• 11-16-2017, 07:00 AM
That seems like a contradiction. (Maybe we are supposed to assume that Mathematics is a different course than mathematics.)
3 replies | 127 view(s)
• 11-16-2017, 06:55 AM
I do not understand the meaning of "height of the floor". Do you?
3 replies | 104 view(s)
• 11-16-2017, 06:46 AM
Posting a question is not a summation. :???: (By the way, you have asked about five forms, not four.) I'm not sure what kind of "breakdown" you...
9 replies | 264 view(s)
• 11-16-2017, 05:57 AM
A = accumulated amount P = principal r = decimal form of interest rate t = elapsed time (in years) The phrase "accumulated amount" means:...
5 replies | 129 view(s)
• 11-16-2017, 05:34 AM
Your first step is incorrect. We may not decompose a ratio by splitting the denominator into pieces. If 1 + e^(-0.01x) were in the numerator,...
2 replies | 83 view(s)
• 11-15-2017, 04:21 AM
If the instructions ask for Set-Builder Notation, the answer is no (for both the domain and the range). Otherwise, you could report: Domain: x ∈...
9 replies | 264 view(s)
• 11-15-2017, 03:23 AM
I guess it's true, but set-builder notation doesn't normally mention relationships between different variables; instead, it lists set(s) or intervals...
9 replies | 264 view(s)
• 11-15-2017, 03:09 AM
Do you realize that two equal sides with a 90° angle between them could be parts of a square?
2 replies | 105 view(s)
• 11-14-2017, 10:43 PM
You didn't answer my question about a need for two symbols. If there's only one solution, and you don't want to state its numerical value, and you...
6 replies | 153 view(s)
• 11-14-2017, 10:04 PM
weird 'forp' = prof That looks like funny business, with the direct.
8 replies | 499 view(s)
• 11-14-2017, 10:00 PM
Yes. The factorizations below are related to what DrPeterson asked you about. First, know that the negative sign in front of a number can be...
6 replies | 222 view(s)
• 11-14-2017, 06:48 AM
I played with this exercise, while waiting for an appointment to show up. I obtained expressions for Kolski's x1 and x2 (i.e., sides b and a,...
7 replies | 361 view(s)
• 11-14-2017, 06:12 AM
Are you sure you need two different symbols for time? If symbol t is already defined as a time variable, then writing, "I want to find all t such...
6 replies | 153 view(s)
• 11-14-2017, 05:02 AM
weird = anagram indicator for p = fodder :D
8 replies | 499 view(s)
• 11-14-2017, 05:00 AM
**** 2 hits = ding & bat screwball = dingbat ****
2 replies | 159 view(s)
More Activity

#### Basic Information

Age
60
Biography:
It's a work in progress
Location:
Seattle
Interests:
Waning
Occupation:
Phototypographer, Bank Courier, Computer Programmer, EMT, ER Physicians Asst, Math Tutor, Retirer, +

#### Signature

"English is the most ambiguous language in the world." ~ Yours Truly, 1969

#### Statistics

Total Posts
8,852
Posts Per Day
2.00
##### General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 11:01 PM
Join Date
10-06-2005
Referrals
1