Gauss Vanzel's theorem is outdated ?

D

diman-charodei

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2017
Messages
4
My proof - exact construction of A regular nonagon inscribed in a circle

Have a good time from Russia,
In this 10 min video I prove exact construction of A regular nonagon (enneagon) inscribed in a circle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNX3P-Q7xO0
If you do not agree with me, try to find a mistake

I'm interested in your opinion.
Thank you for taking the time to read my post.
with the best regards,
Diman-Charodei

Sorry, it's my mistake in translate - Gauss–Wantzel theorem
russian link - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Теорема_Гаусса_—_Ванцеля
english links - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructible_polygon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_polygon
NONAGON - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonagon
 
Last edited:
diman-charodei said:
Have a good time from Russia,
In this 10 min video I prove, that Gauss Vanzel's theorem is outdated
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNX3P-Q7xO0
If you do not agree with me, try to find a mistake

I'm interested in your opinion.
Thank you for taking the time to read my post.
with the best regards,
Diman-Charodei
Click to expand...
I could not find Gauss-Vanzell theorem in the internet!

Is this same as the Gauss's divergence theorem (or Ostrogradsky's theorem - as known in Russia)?
 
True or false ?

Please, who see my video, answer in this trhread - my construction and proof - True or false ?
What You think about ?
 
diman-charodei said:
Please, who see my video, answer in this trhread - my construction and proof - True or false ?
What You think about ?
Click to expand...
This forum was created to allow an interface for volunteers to help struggling math students with their homework. There are no "peer reviewers" or publishers here. For a review of your proof(s), you might want to consider hiring a qualified graduate student at your local university.

Good luck! ;)
 
Just I try to find some people, who ready discuss my construction and somebody may be find mistake in my version of regular nonagon inscribed in a circle. Because, a regular nonagon inscribed in a circle without approximation is impossible, if we believe Gauss–Wantzel theorem.
If you think that I have no right public my question on this forum - You can delete my theme.
 
diman-charodei said:
Please, who see my video, answer in this thread - my construction and proof - True or false ? What You think about ?
Click to expand...
Your thread is okay, but you may need to wait some time, before someone with interest chooses to examine your work and respond. :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top