So assume that when looking at things through different size lenses (ex. microscope to telescope) assuming that if you represent this information as a graph, it would look like a bell curve..
There would be an average size of things in the universe compared to the different lenses that you use to look at things in the universe. This assumes you are not necessarily looking from any particular place (like from the POV of earth for example), but instead you are looking at objects from where they are and not where you are. So what we would be really measuring is the lens that we use to look at things and not the size of the object itself, but the bell curve would still represent the size of things in the universe. This model works under the paradigm of Newton and not Einstein, because it doesn't consider that space and time are related insofar as calculating for the space in the universe and or dark energy or anything we can't really see with the naked eye.
Do you think this model would make sense?
There would be an average size of things in the universe compared to the different lenses that you use to look at things in the universe. This assumes you are not necessarily looking from any particular place (like from the POV of earth for example), but instead you are looking at objects from where they are and not where you are. So what we would be really measuring is the lens that we use to look at things and not the size of the object itself, but the bell curve would still represent the size of things in the universe. This model works under the paradigm of Newton and not Einstein, because it doesn't consider that space and time are related insofar as calculating for the space in the universe and or dark energy or anything we can't really see with the naked eye.
Do you think this model would make sense?