Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Real formula?

  1. #1

    Real formula?


    I have added a image. It is this a real formula?
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    What does your question even mean? Is there a formula test for REALness?

    Just read it careful for what t claims.
    "Unique Answers Don't Care How You Find Them." - Many may have said it, but I hear it most from me.

  3. #3
    Elite Member mmm4444bot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    I'm not sure why you're asking.

    Are you, perhaps, a beginning algebra student, and you're wondering if the statements in that image are valid or faked? (You posted on the Beginning Algebra board).

    Or, you are not a beginning algebra student, and you posted on the wrong board, maybe?

    What you posted is not beginning algebra, and it looks like valid math. It seems to conclude that -- in some sequence of numbers -- the difference between adjacent elements is non-negative. That could also be interpreted as a conclusion that the number sequence is decreasing.
    "English is the most ambiguous language in the world." ~ Yours Truly, 1969

  4. #4
    Elite Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Like mmm, I do not exactly what you are asking or why it is posted in beginners' algebra.

    If the only information given is what is shown in the excerpt posted, that excerpt is logically flawed.

    [tex]x_{k+1}^2 = \dfrac{1}{4} * \left (x_k^2 + 2A + \dfrac{A^2}{x_k^2} \right ) = \dfrac{x_k^2 + 2A + \dfrac{A^2}{x_k^2}}{4} \implies[/tex]

    [tex]x_{k+1}^2 - A = \dfrac{x_k^2 + 2A + \dfrac{A^2}{x_k^2}}{4} - A = \dfrac{x_k^2 + 2A + \dfrac{A^2}{x_k^2}}{4} - \dfrac{4A}{4} \implies[/tex]

    [tex]x_{k+1}^2 - A = \dfrac{x_k^2 - 2A + \dfrac{A^2}{x_k^2}}{4} - A = \left ( \dfrac{x_k - \dfrac{A}{x_k}}{2} \right )^2 \ge 0 \implies x_{k+1}^2 - A \ge 0 \implies[/tex]

    [tex]x_{k+1}^2 \ge A \implies \sqrt{x_{k+1}^2} \ge \sqrt{A} \implies |x_{k+1}| \ge \sqrt{A} \not \implies x_{k + 1} \ge \sqrt{A}.[/tex]

    Moreover the indexing is a bit weird in the final conclusion. Does it relate to k = 1 or not?


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts