I was joking pka...having a bad day?Oh good grief! Just look at the posted diagram. That is what it looks like.
I was joking pka...having a bad day?Oh good grief! Just look at the posted diagram. That is what it looks like.
Yes; sqrt(161) = ~12.7View attachment 10954
I found the sqrt(161) side and 10*sqrt(2) side.
Then tried to do something about the fact that the extended ones are also right triangles...
Oh my goodness, Denis with a headache. You normally are a headache on this forum. I can only imagine what will happen tonight.Yes; sqrt(161) = ~12.7
Now look at your diagram: do you not see that 12.7 is IMPOSSIBLE?
Where did you get this problem?
Are you sure you copied it properly?
If you want more discussion on your diagram,
please label the 3 points where the 90degree angles are,
so we can refer to them: use D on AB, E on BC extended, F on AC extended.
Getting a headache...bye...
It works for me.… sqrt(161) = ~12.7
… do you not see that 12.7 is IMPOSSIBLE?
Agree! (I don't think the OP created that diagram.)… please label the 3 points where the 90degree angles are, so we can refer to them:
use D on AB, E on BC extended, F on AC extended …
I think that the confusion is much deeper than that.It works for me.
sqrt(161)^2 + 8^2 = 15^2
Are you confusing a leg for the hypotenuse, maybe?
NO!! sqrt(161) is the correct calculation;It works for me.
sqrt(161)^2 + 8^2 = 15^2
Are you confusing a leg for the hypotenuse, maybe?
You da*n right it is !!I think that the confusion is much deeper than that.
Why does it not fit in the diagram? What EXACTLY does that mean? Do you mean the scale will be off? What the hay do you mean?NO!! sqrt(161) is the correct calculation;
what I'm trying to f'n say is "it does NOT fit in that diagram"!!
Since CD=5 and BC=15 are givens,c = DB
c = 1/4*sqrt(7250+360*sqrt(161)-150*sqrt(1625+104*sqrt(161)))
Frickin' typos! I botched my data entry.Since CD=5 and BC=15 are givens,
isn't c = sqrt(15^2 - 5^2) = ~14.14
The one you're showing evaluates to ~15.16 …
This is what I've been saying all along: NO SOLUTION!Frickin' typos! I botched my data entry.
Yes, side DB (c) is 10∙√2
After fixing my goof, the software reports no solutions. Here's the system:
a^2 = b^2 + 5^2 [1]
a^2 = d^2 + 6^2 [2]
(b + 10∙√2)^2 = (a + √161)^2 + 8^2 [3]
(b + 10∙√2)^2 = (d + 15)^2 + 6^2 [4]
View attachment 10954
So, the area of this triangle is to be calculated using only simple methods. I've calculated partial sides with the information I had, but found myself unable to proceed without the use of trigonometry. Any ideas on this one?
Ahhhh gezzzzzzus, I feel like vomiting...
Just realised that the 2 givens 6cm and 8cm are not part
of a f'n diagram, but simply the heights of that triangle
from 2 of the bases. D*mn, all that wasted time
So the area is simply 45.
I ain't looking at another triangle problem for a good while!
If I ever meet you, I'll hit you on the head with my hockey stick!Thanks a lot. Thank you everyone for your time and effort.
If I ever meet you, I'll hit you on the head with my hockey stick!