Lazy Einstein
New member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2013
- Messages
- 1
With an increasing love for Mathematics, I am trying to teach myself more and more everyday.
I am in an Avionics technician program in college. I have learned all about Trigonometric identities, Pythagorean's theorem, reading Cartesians and complex plane graphs, and everything in elementary Algebra.
Through studying Mathematics and Physics and my own time I have come to learning about "the why of sine, cosine, and tangent". This had me looking at the fact that I can use the universally taught 360 angular degrees of a circle or it's less used equivalent reference of radians.
I get that π = C/d(Circumference over diameter equals pi), θ = s/r(Arc length over radius equals subtended arc in radians), and π = C of a circle with d = 1. So a r = 1 circle has a circumference of 2π.
Radians have a reason for being used as a reference with circles; however, it seems to me that 360 degrees is just an arbitrary reference that is no longer needed.
Am I wrong? Does the use of 360 angular degrees still provide a more elegant reference system for some Math that radians wouldn't? Is it just because radians are a pure number but degrees have a unit association?
Hope my question is clear.
Cheers
I am in an Avionics technician program in college. I have learned all about Trigonometric identities, Pythagorean's theorem, reading Cartesians and complex plane graphs, and everything in elementary Algebra.
Through studying Mathematics and Physics and my own time I have come to learning about "the why of sine, cosine, and tangent". This had me looking at the fact that I can use the universally taught 360 angular degrees of a circle or it's less used equivalent reference of radians.
I get that π = C/d(Circumference over diameter equals pi), θ = s/r(Arc length over radius equals subtended arc in radians), and π = C of a circle with d = 1. So a r = 1 circle has a circumference of 2π.
Radians have a reason for being used as a reference with circles; however, it seems to me that 360 degrees is just an arbitrary reference that is no longer needed.
Am I wrong? Does the use of 360 angular degrees still provide a more elegant reference system for some Math that radians wouldn't? Is it just because radians are a pure number but degrees have a unit association?
Hope my question is clear.
Cheers