You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Rengoku0510
- Start date

- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015

- Messages
- 3,812

I hope that I'm not misunderstanding, but it seems the description above works only for the specific form in this exercise -- assuming n itself is a Whole number.positive leading coefficient for the exponent ... and vice versa

When I read 'leading coefficient', then for a negative case (in general), I think of

a^(-n + b)

That exponent has a negative leading coefficient, yet we can't say whether the expression represents a power of 'a' or the reciprocal of that power.

- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015

- Messages
- 3,812

There are many ways to "simplify" algebraic expressions. Expressions in beginning courses are often cooked up for practicing specific definitions, properties and/or rules.

Later on, when we use our skills to algebraically manipulate given information, there might be a specific goal in mind concerning a specific application in the real world.

For example, later on we might be working with exponential growth over time (of some chemical reaction, perhaps), using a model like this:

y = a*b^t

Let's say the expression given in this thread is an example of some potential data from chemistry experiments. We may simplify it to obtain the exponential form above (treating n as the time variable).

y = (9/125)*(3/125)^n

a = 9/125

b = 3/125

t = n

This alternate simplification can be obtained by applying definitions and proprties, just like the OP did, but with a different goal in mind.