Monkeyseat
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2005
- Messages
- 298
This is the question (in 2 parts really).
It's just I looked at the answers in the back of the book and they only used the bit 5x - 4 > 0 to prove that x > 4/5 so am I right that is why they didn't use 2x + 3 > 0 because it can't be a negative length? I mean that x > -3/2 or -1.5 can't be true?
Baisically, can someone clear up (the first part of the question) why they are asking to prove that x is 4/5 and not use 2x + 3 > 0 and get -3/2 or -1.5? Is it because of the negative sign? I.E. you can't have -1.5cm?
The book's answer to this was:
Sorry if that was a bit messy/didn't make sense. I tried to make it as uncomplicated as possible.
Many thanks.
This is what I did:Part 1: A rectangular plot of land has dimensions 2x + 3 meters by 5x - 4 meters. Explain why x > 4/5.
Part 2: Given that the perimeter is less than 40 meters, find another inequality satisfied by x.
I think I have kinda done it right (well at least part 2) but am I right with the first part of the question - the bit about 4/5?Part 1:
2x + 3 > 0
This has to be bigger than 0 in length.
2x > -3
x > -3/2 or -1.5
It cannot be this low i.e. x cannot be a negative length like -1.4.
-----------
5x - 4 > 0
This has to be bigger than 0 in length.
5x > 4
x > 4/5 or 0.8
This length satisifies both sides so it must be this. It is greater than 0.
-----------
Part 2:
2 (2x + 3) + 2 (5x - 4) < 40
4x + 6 + 10x - 8 < 40
14x - 2 < 40
14x < 42
x < 3
It's just I looked at the answers in the back of the book and they only used the bit 5x - 4 > 0 to prove that x > 4/5 so am I right that is why they didn't use 2x + 3 > 0 because it can't be a negative length? I mean that x > -3/2 or -1.5 can't be true?
Baisically, can someone clear up (the first part of the question) why they are asking to prove that x is 4/5 and not use 2x + 3 > 0 and get -3/2 or -1.5? Is it because of the negative sign? I.E. you can't have -1.5cm?
The book's answer to this was:
5x - 4 > 0 (can't have a negative length), therefore 5x > 4, therefore x > 4/5 then x < 3.
Sorry if that was a bit messy/didn't make sense. I tried to make it as uncomplicated as possible.
Many thanks.