#### needsmathhelpnow

##### New member

- Joined
- Jan 24, 2023

- Messages
- 3

Is there any mathematical functions that has a parameter that i can tune?

Thanks in advance

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter needsmathhelpnow
- Start date

- Joined
- Jan 24, 2023

- Messages
- 3

Is there any mathematical functions that has a parameter that i can tune?

Thanks in advance

- Joined
- Jan 24, 2023

- Messages
- 3

Given is the following data:

population | growth last month |

200 | 500% |

150 | 45% |

2500 | 28% |

7000 | 15% |

I think that is a common problem, i just cant wrap my head around it.

- Joined
- Feb 4, 2004

- Messages
- 16,003

I have a real world problem where i select populations based on growth. The growth of a population highly depends on its starting size, e.g. small populations grow faster than already large populations. Now i want do not only want small populations in my selection but also large ones because growth in those populations is harder to archive.

Is there any mathematical functions that has a parameter that i can tune?

"Populations" of what? "Select" how? If you are selecting "based on growth", can't you find the growth and then do the selecting?

Given is the following data:

My current logic is just select everything that grew more than 30% last month. But what i actually want is a function that selects based on population grow, in other words the bigger the population is the smaller the growth has to be to be selected.

population growth last month 200 500% 150 45% 2500 28% 7000 15%

I think that is a common problem, i just cant wrap my head around it.

In what manner do the smaller populations grow faster than the larger populations? If you are selecting based on high growth, how is that supposed to fit into selecting slow-growth populations?

It would probably help if you provided us the all the information upon which you're trying to develop a model. When you reply, please include a clear listing of your thoughts and efforts so far, as well as your current level of mathematical study.

Thank you!

Eliz.

- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014

- Messages
- 13,417

This table is contradicting what you said. Clearly a population of 150 is smaller than a population of 200, but according to what you said, the smaller population should grow more quickly. Your table shows the opposite. What do you have to say about that?

Given is the following data:

My current logic is just select everything that grew more than 30% last month. But what i actually want is a function that selects based on population grow, in other words the bigger the population is the smaller the growth has to be to be selected.

population growth last month 200 500% 150 45% 2500 28% 7000 15%

I think that is a common problem, i just cant wrap my head around it.

- Joined
- Jan 24, 2023

- Messages
- 3

This is just an example. Lets say i have thousands of populations ranging from 2k to 600k. It is easier for a small population, to double in size, than for a already large population.

I am selecting the 10 populations that grew the most every week.

Right now i have a rigid rule: return me the 10 populations that grew the most. (as a recommendation)

The problem is that it almost always returns me 10 small populations, but i would like to select larger populations that still had good growth (e.g. 20%) as well.

Intuitively i would like to penalize the growth of small populations or boost the growth of larger populations without using rigid brackets.

EDIT:

I think one way to achieve this would be to use a weighted growth metric. Maybe i could multiply the growth by the logarithm of the population size.

I am selecting the 10 populations that grew the most every week.

Right now i have a rigid rule: return me the 10 populations that grew the most. (as a recommendation)

The problem is that it almost always returns me 10 small populations, but i would like to select larger populations that still had good growth (e.g. 20%) as well.

Intuitively i would like to penalize the growth of small populations or boost the growth of larger populations without using rigid brackets.

EDIT:

I think one way to achieve this would be to use a weighted growth metric. Maybe i could multiply the growth by the logarithm of the population size.

Last edited:

- Joined
- Feb 4, 2004

- Messages
- 16,003

Please realize that this sounds as though you are seeking the services of a data-mining or -modelling company, rather than for hints and helps on math homework...?This is just an example. Lets say i have thousands of populations ranging from 2k to 600k....

Eliz.

- Joined
- Oct 30, 2021

- Messages
- 1,598

This sounds like one way to get closer to your goals.I think one way to achieve this would be to use a weighted growth metric. Maybe i could multiply the growth by the logarithm of the population size.

But there are infinite number of functions (of the population size and its growth) which would satisfy your criterion. If I had a practical problem like this I'd come up with at least several such functions and see which ones produce results I like the most.