Reason for radicals vs. rational exponents?

jpanknin

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Messages
89
I'm revisiting math and trying to get a more intuitive feel rather than just memorize formulas and concepts. One that confuses me is why are radical symbols ( [imath]\sqrt{}[/imath] )used rather than rational exponents (i.e., [math]8^{\frac{1}{3}}=2[/math])? Everything I've come across on working with radicals says to convert them to rational exponents and then solve. So...why are radical symbols still used at all? Is there a good reason for using them?
 
I'm revisiting math and trying to get a more intuitive feel rather than just memorize formulas and concepts. One that confuses me is why are radical symbols ( [imath]\sqrt{}[/imath] )used rather than rational exponents (i.e., [math]8^{\frac{1}{3}}=2[/math])? Everything I've come across on working with radicals says to convert them to rational exponents and then solve. So...why are radical symbols still used at all? Is there a good reason for using them?
There are several situations like this where we have a couple synonymous notations, like fractions and decimals.

I would say that radicals are, first, much easier to write for something basic like [imath]\sqrt{2}[/imath]. That alone is enough reason for radicals to still be used.

I think they also make some complicated expressions easier to follow, like maybe [imath]\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}-\sqrt[3]{y}}{\sqrt[3]{x}+\sqrt[3]{y}}[/imath]. And sometimes we just use radicals in one expression for consistency because we've used them in another.

To be honest, though, given [imath]8^{\frac{1}{3}}[/imath], I would first read it, if not write it, as [imath]\sqrt[3]{8}[/imath] in order to evaluate it!
 
Thanks, @Dr.Peterson. That makes sense. However, are there situations where leaving it in radical form (other than simple expressions like [imath]\sqrt[3]{8}[/imath]) would be easier/better to work with (solve) or do rational exponents make that easier?
 
Thanks, @Dr.Peterson. That makes sense. However, are there situations where leaving it in radical form (other than simple expressions like [imath]\sqrt[3]{8}[/imath]) would be easier/better to work with (solve) or do rational exponents make that easier?
It may be partly a matter of familiarity (because we learn the radical form first), but it feels easier to simplify something like
[math]\sqrt[3]{81x^4y^5}=\sqrt[3]{27x^3y^3}\sqrt[3]{3x^1y^2}=3xy\sqrt[3]{3x^1y^2}[/math]than
[math](81x^4y^5)^\frac{1}{3}=(3^4)^\frac{1}{3}x^\frac{4}{3}y^\frac{5}{3}=3^{1+\frac{1}{3}}x^{1+\frac{1}{3}}y^{1+\frac{2}{3}}=3\cdot3^\frac{1}{3}x\cdot x^\frac{1}{3}y\cdot y^\frac{2}{3}=3xy(3xy^2)^\frac{1}{3}[/math]
 
It may be partly a matter of familiarity (because we learn the radical form first), but it feels easier to simplify something like
[math]\sqrt[3]{81x^4y^5}=\sqrt[3]{27x^3y^3}\sqrt[3]{3x^1y^2}=3xy\sqrt[3]{3x^1y^2}[/math]than
[math](81x^4y^5)^\frac{1}{3}=(3^4)^\frac{1}{3}x^\frac{4}{3}y^\frac{5}{3}=3^{1+\frac{1}{3}}x^{1+\frac{1}{3}}y^{1+\frac{2}{3}}=3\cdot3^\frac{1}{3}x\cdot x^\frac{1}{3}y\cdot y^\frac{2}{3}=3xy(3xy^2)^\frac{1}{3}[/math]
And, just to be my difficult self, I disagree. I feel that the second expression is easier to work with. However that might simply be how I was introduced to the topic in High School... we tended to use powers rather than radicals for anything that wasn't a square root.

-Dan
 
Since we are being difficult, I will more difficult that topsquark. I disagree with both of you. It is a matter of style/taste whether you write an expression using radicals or exponents. Sometimes you might think radicals is a better/nicer form and other times you might choose exponents.
All kidding aside, I truly believe that the answer to which you should use is entirely up to you. It is purely a matter of what you like.
 
I'm revisiting math and trying to get a more intuitive feel rather than just memorize formulas and concepts. One that confuses me is why are radical symbols ( [imath]\sqrt{}[/imath] )used rather than rational exponents (i.e., [math]8^{\frac{1}{3}}=2[/math])? Everything I've come across on working with radicals says to convert them to rational exponents and then solve. So...why are radical symbols still used at all? Is there a good reason for using them?
I like "exponents" - it can be carried over to "complex analyses" very conveniently.
 
Very interesting thread. Thanks @Dr.Peterson, @topsquark, @Steven G, and @Subhotosh Khan. I've never seen each method side-by-side, but I can see situations that seem easier (to me) with both approaches. Appreciate the debate. It really was helpful to hear both sides and see how each approach would be simplified.
 
Top