Clueless about the Laplace Operational Method

wolly

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
116
Hi I'm trying to calculate the order of the poles in the Laplace Transform Operational Method and I have no idea what order they are.


asfaf.PNG

Can the pole be negative like -1 ? I wanted to solve a Laplace differential equation and I don't know a lot about this!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250420_194737.jpg
    IMG_20250420_194737.jpg
    2.8 MB · Views: 6
Can the pole be negative like -1 ?
Yes.
Example of a negative pole:

F(s)=1(s+1)2\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s + 1)^2}

s=1\displaystyle s = -1 is a negative pole of order 2\displaystyle 2
 
Yes.
Example of a negative pole:

F(s)=1(s+1)2\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s + 1)^2}

s=1\displaystyle s = -1 is a negative pole of order 2\displaystyle 2
And 1 and 2 are poles of what order?
 
And 1 and 2 are poles of what order?
A pole is a value that makes the denominator =0\displaystyle = 0. A pole can have any order.

For example:

F(s)=1(s1)\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 1)} \rightarrow here s=1\displaystyle s = 1 is a pole of order 1\displaystyle 1

F(s)=1(s1)2\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 1)^2} \rightarrow here s=1\displaystyle s = 1 is a pole of order 2\displaystyle 2

F(s)=1(s1)3\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 1)^3} \rightarrow here s=1\displaystyle s = 1 is a pole of order 3\displaystyle 3

And

F(s)=1(s2)\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 2)} \rightarrow here s=2\displaystyle s = 2 is a pole of order 1\displaystyle 1

F(s)=1(s2)2\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 2)^2} \rightarrow here s=2\displaystyle s = 2 is a pole of order 2\displaystyle 2

F(s)=1(s2)100\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 2)^{100}} \rightarrow here s=2\displaystyle s = 2 is a pole of order 100\displaystyle 100


Understood the idea?

🤔
 
A pole is a value that makes the denominator =0\displaystyle = 0. A pole can have any order.

For example:

F(s)=1(s1)\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 1)} \rightarrow here s=1\displaystyle s = 1 is a pole of order 1\displaystyle 1

F(s)=1(s1)2\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 1)^2} \rightarrow here s=1\displaystyle s = 1 is a pole of order 2\displaystyle 2

F(s)=1(s1)3\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 1)^3} \rightarrow here s=1\displaystyle s = 1 is a pole of order 3\displaystyle 3

And

F(s)=1(s2)\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 2)} \rightarrow here s=2\displaystyle s = 2 is a pole of order 1\displaystyle 1

F(s)=1(s2)2\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 2)^2} \rightarrow here s=2\displaystyle s = 2 is a pole of order 2\displaystyle 2

F(s)=1(s2)100\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - 2)^{100}} \rightarrow here s=2\displaystyle s = 2 is a pole of order 100\displaystyle 100


Understood the idea?

🤔
How do you decide it's order?
 
And i and -i?
Do you have an example of that in your mind? Or do you mean this:

F(s)=1(s+i)p\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s + i)^p}

And this:

F(s)=1(si)p\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - i)^p}

??
 
Do you have an example of that in your mind? Or do you mean this:

F(s)=1(s+i)p\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s + i)^p}

And this:

F(s)=1(si)p\displaystyle F(s) = \frac{1}{(s - i)^p}

??
For example If z=2iz=2i and z=2iz=-2ifrom the function

f(z)=1z2+4f(z)=\frac{1}{z^2+4}
Which order would be 2i and -2i as a pole?
 
Or

10(z2+4)(z32z2z+2)+z2z4z32z2z+2\frac{10}{(z^2+4)(z^3-2z^2-z+2)} + \frac{z^2-z-4}{z^3-2z^2-z+2}
 
For example If z=2iz=2i and z=2iz=-2ifrom the function

f(z)=1z2+4f(z)=\frac{1}{z^2+4}
Which order would be 2i and -2i as a pole?
First factor the denominator.

f(z)=1z2+4=1(z+2i)(z2i)\displaystyle f(z) = \frac{1}{z^2 + 4} = \frac{1}{(z + 2i)(z - 2i)}

So, we have two poles, z=2i\displaystyle z = 2i and z=2i\displaystyle z = -2i, each one of them is of order one.

Or

10(z2+4)(z32z2z+2)+z2z4z32z2z+2\frac{10}{(z^2+4)(z^3-2z^2-z+2)} + \frac{z^2-z-4}{z^3-2z^2-z+2}
You always start by factoring first.

f(z)=10(z2+4)(z32z2z+2)+z2z4z32z2z+2\displaystyle f(z) = \frac{10}{(z^2+4)(z^3-2z^2-z+2)} + \frac{z^2-z-4}{z^3-2z^2-z+2}

=10(z+2i)(z2i)(z+1)(z1)(z2)+z2z4(z+2i)(z2i)(z+1)(z1)(z2)\displaystyle = \frac{10}{(z + 2i)(z - 2i)(z + 1)(z - 1)(z - 2)} + \frac{z^2-z-4}{(z + 2i)(z - 2i)(z + 1)(z - 1)(z - 2)}

Since the numerator z2z4\displaystyle z^2-z-4 does not have a nice factor, it will not be cancelled with the denominator, so you leave it alone.

Now we collect the poles. These are the poles:

z=2i\displaystyle z = 2i
z=2i\displaystyle z = -2i
z=1\displaystyle z = 1
z=1\displaystyle z = -1
z=2\displaystyle z = 2

Each one of them is of order one.
 
Last edited:
I have used the residue theorem but this is in a Laplace Operational method with

Θ(p)=Y(p)eptΘ(p)=Y(p)*e^{pt}
Can p be irrational?If yes then how can it be solved in this equation?
@logistic_guy ?

It's based on the 2 functions which I wrote today.
 
f(z)=10(z2+4)(z32z2z+2)+z2z4z32z2z+2f(z) = \frac{10}{(z^2+4)(z^3-2z^2-z+2)} + \frac{z^2-z-4}{z^3-2z^2-z+2}
This one^
 
Can p be irrational?If yes then how can it be solved in this equation?
Yes it can be.

It's based on the 2 functions which I wrote today.
The two functions that you wrote had real and imaginary poles, not irrational.

An irrational pole will be something likes this:

f(z)=1z2\displaystyle f(z) = \frac{1}{z - \sqrt{2}}

Here z=2\displaystyle z = \sqrt{2} is an irrational pole.

how can it be solved in this equation?
You can use the Laplace transform table.

Or use the residue theorem.
 
Yes it can be.


The two functions that you wrote had real and imaginary poles, not irrational.

An irrational pole will be something likes this:

f(z)=1z2\displaystyle f(z) = \frac{1}{z - \sqrt{2}}

Here z=2\displaystyle z = \sqrt{2} is an irrational pole.


You can use the Laplace transform table.

Or use the residue theorem.
So z tends to 2i-2i and 2i2i?

limz2if(z)(z2i)eptlim_{z \to 2i} f(z)*(z-2i)*e^{pt}and
limz2if(z)(z+2i)eptlim_{z \to -2i} f(z)*(z+2i)*e^{pt}
I mean I don't know how to calculate e2ite^{2it} and e2ite^{-2it}!
@logistic_guy
 
rezθ(pk)=1(mk1)![(ppk)mkY(p)ept]rezθ(p_k)=\frac{1}{(m_k-1)!}*\bigr[(p-p_k)^{m_k}*Y(p)*e^{pt} \bigr]
I also found this formula in my textbook but I don't know who is mkm_k!
 
It says in my book that mkm_k is the order of multiplicity!
 
Also can the result of the limit of the residue have values like i,2i and so on?
 
Top