3 independence of path explanations needed

kyle_can

New member
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
4
Hi guys! Having trouble wrapping my head around independence of path. Trying to give an explanation to these problems. Any corrections and clarifications would be helpful and appreciated. Thanks!

Screen_Shot_2014_05_12_at_5_08_53_PM.png

my explanation: If you are for example, trying to compute energy using the fundamental theorem of calculus, path independence means that the work perform does not depend on the endpoints?


Screen_Shot_2014_05_12_at_5_08_58_PM.png


my explanation: If you are for example, trying to compute energy using the fundamental theorem of calculus, path independence means that the work perform does not depend on the endpoints?

Screen_Shot_2014_05_12_at_5_09_07_PM.png

my explanation: the line integral around any closed path is 0 and the line integral around ALL closed paths is zero, therefore leading to path independence.
 
Hi guys! Having trouble wrapping my head around independence of path. Trying to give an explanation to these problems. Any corrections and clarifications would be helpful and appreciated. Thanks!

View attachment 4089

my explanation: If you are for example, trying to compute energy using the fundamental theorem of calculus, path independence means that the work perform does not depend on the endpoints?
Completely the contrary! It means that the integral depends only on the endpoints.

View attachment 4090


my explanation: If you are for example, trying to compute energy using the fundamental theorem of calculus, path independence means that the work perform does not depend on the endpoints?
Isn't this what you just said? Also neither of these two problems says anything about "energy". You should give a purely mathematical explanation. (If F'(x)= f(x) then \(\displaystyle \int_a^b f(x)dx= F(b)- F(a)\).)
View attachment 4091

my explanation: the line integral around any closed path is 0 and the line integral around ALL closed paths is zero, therefore leading to path independence.
I think you mean IF the line integral around any closed path is 0 then we have path independence- and vice versa.
 
Top