This is a Diophantine equation, and they are indeed
hard. See the relevant wiki article.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diophantine_equation.
Moreover, it is a vexing problem because it requires a lot of unnecessary work to determine whether there are multiple solutions to the cubic. There are, but it turns out to make no difference to the sum asked for
One way to solve these beasts is to use every bit of information that you have to reduce the amount of trial and error required. If you follow Dr. P's advice to take into account that the solutions wanted are all even numbers, you get:
\(\displaystyle a = 2x,\ b = 2y, \ c = 2z \text { and } x,\ y,\ z \in \mathbb Z.\).
If you further notice that a, b, and c are all positive, you get
\(\displaystyle 2 \le a \implies 1 \le x.\)
Now here is a general technique that applies to many such questions. These numbers may or may not be equal, but they certainly can be ordered. And because labelling the unknowns is arbitrary, we can say
\(\displaystyle 1 \le x \le y \le z.\)
Finally, we know
\(\displaystyle a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = 2008 \implies 8x^3 + 8y^3 + 8z^3 = 2008 \implies x^3 + y^3 + z^3 = 251.\)
Now, unless you are knowledgeable about solving Diophantine equations, you will need trial and error, but you can be clever about it.
The cubes start small, but grow fast.
4^3 = 64 and 3 * 64 = 192 < 251 so z > 4. Do you see why?
7^3 = 343 > 226 so z < 7. Do you see why?
Thus z = 5 or z = 6.
Moreover, we might try z = 6 first because it will put the greater constraints on y.
Give it a go to complete it. Remember that x and y must be integers and that
\(\displaystyle 1 \le x \le y \le z.\)