Hi all. I have a basic question that I cannot grasp the concept of. I am studying limits.
Suppose I have to evaluate the limit, as x approaches positive infinity, of (2x^4-x^2+8x) over -5x^4+7.
To solve this problem I would factor out the largest power of x that is in the denominator which is x^4. In doing so, I would end up with
x^4 (2-(1/x^2)+(8/x^3) over x^4 (-5+(7/x^4)
I totally understand the factorization that I just explained.
This is the concept that I do not understand. So again, suppose I have to evaluate the limit, as x approaches positive infinity, of
(e^10x - 4e^6x + 3e^x + 2e^-2x - 9e^-15)
I would again start by factoring the largest power of x which is e^10x. However on this one why am I bringing the exponents to the numerator? In the first example I did not bring my exponents to the numerator. For an example if I am factoring the e^10x from the second term it should be 4/e^4x. However, I have 4e^-4x. I hope everyone can understand my question. I do not know how to use La Tex yet. Thanks
Suppose I have to evaluate the limit, as x approaches positive infinity, of (2x^4-x^2+8x) over -5x^4+7.
To solve this problem I would factor out the largest power of x that is in the denominator which is x^4. In doing so, I would end up with
x^4 (2-(1/x^2)+(8/x^3) over x^4 (-5+(7/x^4)
I totally understand the factorization that I just explained.
This is the concept that I do not understand. So again, suppose I have to evaluate the limit, as x approaches positive infinity, of
(e^10x - 4e^6x + 3e^x + 2e^-2x - 9e^-15)
I would again start by factoring the largest power of x which is e^10x. However on this one why am I bringing the exponents to the numerator? In the first example I did not bring my exponents to the numerator. For an example if I am factoring the e^10x from the second term it should be 4/e^4x. However, I have 4e^-4x. I hope everyone can understand my question. I do not know how to use La Tex yet. Thanks
Last edited by a moderator: