Basic Understanding
- Thread starter nosit
- Start date
Steven G
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
- Messages
- 14,383
Did you notice the x+h which is highlighted here: f(x+h) - f(x)
I take it that you do not understand what f(x) = 2x - 5 means. Since x is between the parenthesis in f(x) and f(x) = 2x-5, then the job for f is to double whatever is between the parenthesis and subtract 5.
For example, f(12) = 2(12)-5. I replaced x with 12. f(-2/3) = 2(-2/3) - 5. So why not f(x+h) = 2(x+h)-5? After all, I doubled what is between the parenthesis and then subtracted 5.
I take it that you do not understand what f(x) = 2x - 5 means. Since x is between the parenthesis in f(x) and f(x) = 2x-5, then the job for f is to double whatever is between the parenthesis and subtract 5.
For example, f(12) = 2(12)-5. I replaced x with 12. f(-2/3) = 2(-2/3) - 5. So why not f(x+h) = 2(x+h)-5? After all, I doubled what is between the parenthesis and then subtracted 5.
pka
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2005
- Messages
- 11,971
You are completely correct about that. In the notation \(\mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \dfrac{{f(x + h) - f(x)}}{h}\), \(h\approx 0\) BUT \(\bf h\ne 0\).
However I don't recall that your question had a limit in it.
I could not disagree more with what Jomo said here. He is allowing the tail to wag the dog.
[MATH]h \ne 0 \implies \dfrac{2h}{h} = 2[/MATH]
ALWAYS, FOREVER AND EVER, AMEN.
For example [MATH]\dfrac{6}{3} = \dfrac{2 * 3}{3} = 2.[/MATH]
The difference quotient is defined as [MATH]\dfrac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h} \text { when } h \ne 0.[/MATH]
The derivative in standard analysis is defined as the limit of the difference quotient as h approaches zero.
Rather obviously, the value of 2 is not affected by the value of h. So the difference quotient and the derivative are exactly equal in this case although that is not the general rule.
These are definitions. No understanding is necessary to follow a definition. Understanding is needed for the meaning of the derivative. But this exercise is just asking you to do a computation according to a rule. And there is no problem of dividing by zero in calculating a difference quotient because the denominator is never zero by definition
[MATH]h \ne 0 \implies \dfrac{2h}{h} = 2[/MATH]
ALWAYS, FOREVER AND EVER, AMEN.
For example [MATH]\dfrac{6}{3} = \dfrac{2 * 3}{3} = 2.[/MATH]
The difference quotient is defined as [MATH]\dfrac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h} \text { when } h \ne 0.[/MATH]
The derivative in standard analysis is defined as the limit of the difference quotient as h approaches zero.
Rather obviously, the value of 2 is not affected by the value of h. So the difference quotient and the derivative are exactly equal in this case although that is not the general rule.
These are definitions. No understanding is necessary to follow a definition. Understanding is needed for the meaning of the derivative. But this exercise is just asking you to do a computation according to a rule. And there is no problem of dividing by zero in calculating a difference quotient because the denominator is never zero by definition
To elaborate on my previous post.
[MATH]g(x) = 2x^2 - 3x + 7.[/MATH]
The difference quotient assumes h is not zero and equals
[MATH]\dfrac{\{2(x + h)^2 - 3(x + h) + 7\} - (2x^2 - 3x + 7)}{h} =[/MATH]
[MATH]\dfrac{2(x^2 + 2hx + h^2) - \cancel {3x} - 3h + \cancel 7 - 2x^2 + \cancel {3x} - \cancel 7}{h} =[/MATH]
[MATH]\dfrac{\cancel {2x^2} + 4xh + 2h^2 - 3h - \cancel {2x^2}}{h} = \dfrac{4xh + 2h^2 - 3h}{h} = 4x - 3 + 2h.[/MATH]
Simple algebra.
And it is intuitive that
[MATH]\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} 4x - 3 + 2h = 4x - 3.[/MATH]
Here the difference quotient and derivative differ (as usually is the case), but there is nothing conceptually difficult about either computation.
[MATH]g(x) = 2x^2 - 3x + 7.[/MATH]
The difference quotient assumes h is not zero and equals
[MATH]\dfrac{\{2(x + h)^2 - 3(x + h) + 7\} - (2x^2 - 3x + 7)}{h} =[/MATH]
[MATH]\dfrac{2(x^2 + 2hx + h^2) - \cancel {3x} - 3h + \cancel 7 - 2x^2 + \cancel {3x} - \cancel 7}{h} =[/MATH]
[MATH]\dfrac{\cancel {2x^2} + 4xh + 2h^2 - 3h - \cancel {2x^2}}{h} = \dfrac{4xh + 2h^2 - 3h}{h} = 4x - 3 + 2h.[/MATH]
Simple algebra.
And it is intuitive that
[MATH]\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} 4x - 3 + 2h = 4x - 3.[/MATH]
Here the difference quotient and derivative differ (as usually is the case), but there is nothing conceptually difficult about either computation.
Steven G
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
- Messages
- 14,383
I agree with what you wrote.
Steven G
Elite Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
- Messages
- 14,383
I don't recall that being the definition of the difference quotient.
I have no problem with you saying that if from the difference quotient you get to 2h/2 that you call that fraction 2. I am sure that you are not the only one who would say that. I just am not one of them. I have absolutely nothing against your viewpoint.
Last edited:
HallsofIvy
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 7,763
Yes, it does. The difference quotient, \(\displaystyle \frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}\) requires that \(\displaystyle h\ne 0\). However, the derivative is NOT the difference quotient, it is the limit of the difference quotient as h goes to 0.
I once made the mistake of agreeing to teach a course titled "Calculus for Economics and Business Administration" in the Business Administration Department. The only prerequisite for the course was basic algebra and I had to use the textbook assigned by the Business Admimistration Department. It was awful! One one page they gave the basic rules for limits:
"The limit of f+ g is the limit of f plus the limit of g."
"The limit of f- g is the limit of f minus the limit of g."
"The limit of fg is the limit of f times the limit of g."
"The limit of f/g is the limit of f divided by the limit .of g provided the limit of g is not 0."
The very next page defines the derivative as "\(\displaystyle \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)- f(x)}{h}\)" completely ignoring the fact the rule for f/g does not apply!
(If you are wondering, we need one more rule: if for some interval (a, b) that includes \(\displaystyle x_0\) f(x)= g(x) for all x except \(\displaystyle x_0\) (a "punctured interval") then \(\displaystyle \lim_{x\to x_0} f(x)= \lim_{x\to x_0) g(x)\).)
Thank you. If you look at my posts #9 and #10, you will see that I did distinguish between the difference quotient and the derivative. However, I had never tried to formulate a general rule for the limit of a quotient when the limit for the denominator was zero.