Definition 1. By the notation pk(x) we mean the k:th derivative of p, the polynomial we get by differentiating p(x) k times.
Now suppose p(x)=xn. Then the k:th derivative of xn is
(n−k)!n!xn−k
Let p(x)=a0+a1x+...+anxn be our usual polynomial. If we differentiate it k times all terms with degree <k vanish and we have
pk(x)=(ak)k!+ak+1(1!(k+1)!)x+...+an((n−k)!n!)xn−k
If we let x=0, then only the constant term "survives",
pk(0)=k!akorak=k!pk(0)Hence we can express the coefficients in p with the help of p:s derivative in 0. We can now use this trick on a special polynomial: p(x)=(1+x)n. By a previous theorem, the k:th derivative of p is equal to
n(n−1)...(n−k+1)(1+x)n−k=(n−k)!n!(1+x)n−k
So
pk(0)=(n−k)!n!
It follows that the coefficient for xk in (1+x)n is equal to
k!pk(0)=(n−k)!k!n!=(kn) Which is the coefficient for xk in (1+x)n
What confuses me about this proof is that the author uses the same notation for all polynomials. I.e first that p(x)=(x+1)n and then as p(x)=a0+a1x+...+anxn. Suppose for clarity that we denote p∗(x)=a0+a1x+...+anxn. Then the underlying assumption seems to be that
pk(0)=p∗k(0)
This is not entirely obvious to me. Is this true since the polynomial p∗(x) was more general?
Now suppose p(x)=xn. Then the k:th derivative of xn is
(n−k)!n!xn−k
Let p(x)=a0+a1x+...+anxn be our usual polynomial. If we differentiate it k times all terms with degree <k vanish and we have
pk(x)=(ak)k!+ak+1(1!(k+1)!)x+...+an((n−k)!n!)xn−k
If we let x=0, then only the constant term "survives",
pk(0)=k!akorak=k!pk(0)Hence we can express the coefficients in p with the help of p:s derivative in 0. We can now use this trick on a special polynomial: p(x)=(1+x)n. By a previous theorem, the k:th derivative of p is equal to
n(n−1)...(n−k+1)(1+x)n−k=(n−k)!n!(1+x)n−k
So
pk(0)=(n−k)!n!
It follows that the coefficient for xk in (1+x)n is equal to
k!pk(0)=(n−k)!k!n!=(kn) Which is the coefficient for xk in (1+x)n
What confuses me about this proof is that the author uses the same notation for all polynomials. I.e first that p(x)=(x+1)n and then as p(x)=a0+a1x+...+anxn. Suppose for clarity that we denote p∗(x)=a0+a1x+...+anxn. Then the underlying assumption seems to be that
pk(0)=p∗k(0)
This is not entirely obvious to me. Is this true since the polynomial p∗(x) was more general?
Last edited: