Do you have the actual problem that this question is coming from? It seems like you are doing an integral using u-substitution and you are letting u = 9x². If we had the problem, I think we can clear up your confusion on this pretty quickly.
This does not follow from your previous statement. Where did the 2 come from? Where did the x^2 go? How did the 18 jump from one side of the equation to the other?
No. The calculus and algebra are both wrong. It looks as though you are just doing things to arrive at a predetermined result. What are you trying to do? In other words, what does the problem say exactly?
When you submit the same problem more than once,
and when you completely disregard the complete solution already given,
you wind up irritating us.
Kahn told you yesterday afternoon that the proper substitution is u=3x, and I might add, a=4. You will then have an integral of the form
∫u2+a2du
for which you were given a formula.
There is a multiplier of (1/3) resulting from the substitution. That coefficient has NOTHING TO DO with the constant of integration, which is always added to the result of integration because the derivative of the constant is zero so it is completely invisible and unknown in the integral.
When you submit the same problem more than once,
and when you completely disregard the complete solution already given,
you wind up irritating us.
Kahn told you yesterday afternoon that the proper substitution is u=3x, and I might add, a=4. You will then have an integral of the form
∫u2+a2du
for which you were given a formula.
There is a multiplier of (1/3) resulting from the substitution. That coefficient has NOTHING TO DO with the constant of integration, which is always added to the result of integration because the derivative of the constant is zero so it is completely invisible and unknown in the integral.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.