Do you know the laws of cosines for a planar triangle?Hi, I need some help with this question. I have to solve for x using the cosine law. Thank you!
View attachment 33498
Sitting in a dark corner usually cools down the brain.I asked someone to check using the given measurements, and they confirmed their solution (which matches my original solution). I need to go back to the drawing board (after my brain cools down).
I too thought to use the law of sines 1st to avoid a quadratic equation. Why would the law of sines fail?My issue before involved confirmation using sin(A)/a=sin(C)/c, to find C and then B. That did not work.
I was able to confirm c=27.4012, using sin(A)/a=sin(B)/b, to find B first and then C.
(I ought to have tried that alternate approach, before wrongly concluding a measurement issue.)
It doesn't (though in principle, like the quadratic, it could have produced two solutions, and it's easier to forget that). But presumably the OP was told to use the law of cosines:I too thought to use the law of sines 1st to avoid a quadratic equation. Why would the law of sines fail?
Hi, I need some help with this question. I have to solve for x using the cosine law. Thank you!
View attachment 33498
Oops, Steven. I hadn't meant to imply that. My effort to confirm the triangle usingWhy would the law of sines fail?
Interestingly, that's exactly what I had in mind when I wroteBut I'd solved for C first, getting arcsin(0.9985) = 86.9084º (incorrect), failing to consider a potential last step:
C = 180º - 86.9084º = 93.0676º
I usually recommend using sines for a triangle like this (SSA), but the cosine approach does have this in its favor.It doesn't (though in principle, like the quadratic, it could have produced two solutions, and it's easier to forget that).