Curve in space - "wrong" answer

Anne-Cathrine

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
2
Hi there :D

I have some trouble with this task:

"A curve in space is given by:
x = cos(2t)
y = sin(2t)
z = 2ln(t)

where the parameter t "passes through" the positive real numbers. Mark the correct exspression for the arc lenght from t = 1 to t = 2"

I have attached a picture showing how I solved it, but the answer in the assignment is not the one I get. I get the correct answer, but I can't figure out how it is the same as the exspression in the multible choice assignment. :(

attachment.php

I have written my calculations and my answer in blue and the answer in the assignment in red. :) (I don't know why it's upside-down?? :confused:)

Thank you in advance! :grin:
 

Attachments

  • 20161230_192031.jpg
    20161230_192031.jpg
    334.2 KB · Views: 2
  • 20161230_194934[1].jpg
    20161230_194934[1].jpg
    401.2 KB · Views: 15
Hi Anne:

They first factored the radicand, and then they simplified the resulting radical.

4 + 4/t^2 factors as (4)(1 + 1/t^2)

The square root of 4 is 2, leaving 1 + 1/t^2 inside the radical sign.

Also, using the definition of negative exponents, they rewrote 1/t^2 as t^(-2).

Questions? :)
 
Hi Otis

Thank you so much for your reply! :D

I'm pretty sure I understand what you are saying, but I have a few questions too check if I've got it right :)

I've written the steps factoring the radicand and simplified the radical, as you explained:

attachment.php


And I've tried to figure out why t^-2 =1/t^2:

attachment.php


If you could tell me if these calculations are correct it would be so great! :D



Hi Anne:

They first factored the radicand, and then they simplified the resulting radical.

4 + 4/t^2 factors as (4)(1 + 1/t^2)

The square root of 4 is 2, leaving 1 + 1/t^2 inside the radical sign.

Also, using the definition of negative exponents, they rewrote 1/t^2 as t^(-2).

Questions? :)
 

Attachments

  • 20161230_214812.jpg
    20161230_214812.jpg
    388.3 KB · Views: 1
  • 20161230_215943.jpg
    20161230_215943.jpg
    381.7 KB · Views: 10
  • 20161230_214822.jpg
    20161230_214822.jpg
    221.7 KB · Views: 10
I am puzzled by this. Finding the arc length, the problem you first stated, is a fairly deep Calculus problem. But the fact that \(\displaystyle t^{-n}= \frac{1}{t^n}\), for any n, is basic algebra.
 
Top