logics: can I assume that "equal" is concrete case of "different"?
Hi guys; I want to verify about something that I'm taking it into consideration but maybe it's wrong ; can I assume that "equal" is concrete case of "different"? because since we want to solve problem we are looking at it in general; I mean in differently ; in other words we are not assume a concrete cases but we are making it in general..
so in that case can I assume that different is a general case of "equal"?
for example; if I want to solve a problem I solve it in general in other words "any case" must be my solutions satisfied .. so "any case" means in different cases and not a specific/concrete case to take to solve a problem; so we must look at problem in "different" cases .. my question in that aspect the different cases is overwhelm "equal" case . right?
Hi guys; I want to verify about something that I'm taking it into consideration but maybe it's wrong ; can I assume that "equal" is concrete case of "different"? because since we want to solve problem we are looking at it in general; I mean in differently ; in other words we are not assume a concrete cases but we are making it in general..
so in that case can I assume that different is a general case of "equal"?
for example; if I want to solve a problem I solve it in general in other words "any case" must be my solutions satisfied .. so "any case" means in different cases and not a specific/concrete case to take to solve a problem; so we must look at problem in "different" cases .. my question in that aspect the different cases is overwhelm "equal" case . right?