Euler formula derived from a power series

Mondo

Junior Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
127
Hello,

I am reading Visual complex analysis book and got stuck at page 12 where the author derives Euler formula from a power series as shown below:
visual_complex_euler_formula.png

Basically figure [9] shows that real numbers are horizontal while imaginary ones are 90 degrees apart. However I don't understand how the author derives C(0) and S(0). For example, why S(0) doesn't contain θ22!\frac{\theta^2}{2!} element - on figure [9] we can see iθ22!\frac{i\theta^2}{2!}? Likewise why it contains θ55!\frac{\theta^5}{5!} while on fig [9] we see this is a real number?


Thanks
 
Hello,

I am reading Visual complex analysis book and got stuck at page 12 where the author derives Euler formula from a power series as shown below:
View attachment 30431

Basically figure [9] shows that real numbers are horizontal while imaginary ones are 90 degrees apart. However I don't understand how the author derives C(0) and S(0). For example, why S(0) doesn't contain θ22!\frac{\theta^2}{2!} element - on figure [9] we can see iθ22!\frac{i\theta^2}{2!}? Likewise why it contains θ55!\frac{\theta^5}{5!} while on fig [9] we see this is a real number?


Thanks
S(θ)S(\theta) only contains the imaginary parts of the series and C(θ)C(\theta) only the real parts.
 
@blamocur yes but this does not answer my question why? Why is θ33!\frac{\theta^3}{3!} considered imaginary and not real?
 
@blamocur yes but this does not answer my question why? Why is θ33!\frac{\theta^3}{3!} considered imaginary and not real?
Because it is actually (iθ)33!\frac{(i\theta)^3}{3!}, which is equal to iθ33!-i\frac{\theta^3}{3!}. Remember, in the Euler formula the sine comes multiplied by ii, i.e. eiθ=cosθ+isinθe^{i\theta} = \cos\theta + \mathbf i \sin \theta.
 
Ok but then the whole figure [9] is nothing but confusion - in the description author says horizontal numbers are all real and then he make θ33!\frac{\theta^3}{3!} an imaginary part. I also don't believe this paragraph is even close to derive Euler formula.

You are justifying this by using your own experience/knowledge not based on the page I pasted.
 
Ok but then the whole figure [9] is nothing but confusion - in the description author says horizontal numbers are all real and then he make θ33!\frac{\theta^3}{3!} an imaginary part. I also don't believe this paragraph is even close to derive Euler formula.

You are justifying this by using your own experience/knowledge not based on the page I pasted.
You are right: I've missed that detail. The horizontal line illustrates the purely real case, i.e. eθe^\theta, while the complex case eiθe^{i\theta} is illustrated by the rectangular spiral.
Sorry for the confusion.
 
Hello,

I am reading Visual complex analysis book and got stuck at page 12 where the author derives Euler formula from a power series as shown below:
View attachment 30431

Basically figure [9] shows that real numbers are horizontal while imaginary ones are 90 degrees apart. However I don't understand how the author derives C(0) and S(0). For example, why S(0) doesn't contain θ22!\frac{\theta^2}{2!} element - on figure [9] we can see iθ22!\frac{i\theta^2}{2!}? Likewise why it contains θ55!\frac{\theta^5}{5!} while on fig [9] we see this is a real number?


Thanks
First, the picture doesn't show iθ22!\frac{i\theta^2}{2!}; it shows (iθ)22!\frac{(i\theta)^2}{2!}, which is a negative real number. Is that what you meant?

Second, S(θ)S(\theta) is a real number, which is the imaginary part of eiθe^{i\theta}.

Did you write out the expansion of eiθe^{i\theta}, and see that alternating terms are imaginary? Please do so, and show your work. You can't see where C(θ)C(\theta) and S(θ)S(\theta) come from without doing that.
 
Ok I think I see it now - every even power in the power series expansion of eiθe^{i\theta} is a real number while the odd power is the imaginary counterpart.
 
Top