Factoring: population can be modelled by p(t) = (16t+50t^3)^(1/3) at time t

ChuckTingle

New member
Joined
Jan 15, 2017
Messages
7
The population, p, of a certain type of berry bush in a conservation area can be modelled by the function p(t) = (16t+50t^3)^(1/3), where t is time in years.
b) When will there be 40 berry bushes.

Honestly I'm just stuck. I can set the equation to 40 and then cube both sides but I'm completely lost after that.
 
The population, p, of a certain type of berry bush in a conservation area can be modelled by the function p(t) = (16t+50t^3)^(1/3), where t is time in years.
b) When will there be 40 berry bushes.

Honestly I'm just stuck. I can set the equation to 40 and then cube both sides but I'm completely lost after that.

Are you meant to solve it algebraically or can you use a GC?
 
I know 10.85 is the factor, I have no idea how to get it using ... factoring.

10.85 is a rounded decimal approximation of the solution.

The polynomial 25t^3 + 8t - 32000 does not factor because the real root is an irrational number.

You could use Newton's Method, to approximate the solution by hand.
:)

 
Well, your original post seems to indicate you've gotten as far as forming a cubic, specifically this:

\(\displaystyle 50t^3+0t^2+16t-64000=0\)

Then, of course, you can factor out a two, leaving:

\(\displaystyle 25t^3+0t^2+8t-32000=0\)

But from here, you're left with having to factor a cubic. In general, there's really no "easy" way to do that, although there are some methods that are easier than others. A good first place to start might be to look for any rational roots, using the Rational Roots Theorem. But that generally won't give you all three roots, unless all three happen to be rational (hint: they don't, in this case). The most straightforward way to factor a cubic is to use the cubic formula. This will give you exact answers, but it's ugly and computationally nasty. So, probably not a good option.

A better method might be to try the Newton-Raphson method. You posted this to the "Calculus" sub-forum, so I'm assuming you know about derivatives enough to be able to use that method (I only say this because sometimes people accidentally post things to the wrong sub-forum). Using a graphing calculator, you can see that there is a root somewhere around 10, so that would be a good x1 to start with.

Edit: Oh, wow. It took me so long to type out this message that a whole bunch of new posts came in the meantime. It seems like you've already gotten most of the way to the solution. I'll still leave my post here for posterity's sake though.
 
Top