Your image is hard to read. I *think* you are asking for help in simplifying an expression (not solving an equation).
Either way, replying will be much easier once you show what you've tried, as this will likely greatly assist in our understanding of what you're asking.
Hi Barbra. We're sorry for the delay, but the forum was hacked/vandalized. Responses to new members have been delayed.
I agree with stapel. The posted expression is of the type used to practice simplifying expressions containing square roots (i.e., radicals), using properties of radicals.
2421–1881–532
Each of the given radicals may be rewritten in the form ba2. That way, each term will contain a factor of 2, so we can combine them into a single term.
First, how do we express 21 and 81 in the form ba2?
Answer: Rationalize the denominators.
21=21=21=21⋅22=22=212
81=221=221=221⋅22=42=412
The third radical 32 needs only simplification, to obtain a multiple of 2.
32=2(16)=216=42
Substituting our rewritten radicals into the given expression yields:
2242–4182–(5)(4)2
These like-terms each contain a factor of 2, which may be factored out.
Hi Barbra. We're sorry for the delay, but the forum was hacked/vandalized. Responses to new members have been delayed.
I agree with stapel. The posted expression is of the type used to practice simplifying expressions containing square roots (i.e., radicals), using properties of radicals.
2421–1881–532
Each of the given radicals may be rewritten in the form ba2. That way, each term will contain a factor of 2, so we can combine them into a single term.
First, how do we express 21 and 81 in the form ba2?
Answer: Rationalize the denominators.
21=21=21=21⋅22=22=212
81=221=221=221⋅22=42=412
The third radical 32 needs only simplification, to obtain a multiple of 2.
32=2(16)=216=42
Substituting our rewritten radicals into the given expression yields:
2242–4182–(5)(4)2
These like-terms each contain a factor of 2, which may be factored out.
For the record when, you write extremely clearly 81 it most certainly is NOT the same as 81. You really need to be clear what you are taking the square root of!
For the record when, you write extremely clearly81 it most certainly is NOT the same as 81. You really need to be clear what you are taking the square root of!
I have to disagree; it isn't written clearly either way:
Your interpretation evidently comes from the radical being entirely above the fraction bar; but it seems at least as clear to me that the fraction bar is entirely under the radical (which in my mind is more important). So I would read this as it clearly was intended to be read (but would then ask about it, to be sure).
My bigger difficulty was in being sure the that last radical contains 32, as the 2 appears to be outside (and smaller; in addition, I initially wondered if it was an "=", because mine too often look like that).
It's true that careful writing is important. (But I'm not sure where the "when," fits into your sentence, so I may be misinterpreting you!)
Your interpretation evidently comes from the radical being entirely above the fraction bar; but it seems at least as clear to me that the fraction bar is entirely under the radical (which in my mind is more important). So I would read this as it clearly was intended to be read (but would then ask about it, to be sure).
Dr Peterson,
It is not whether I interpreted the factor correctly or not, but it is about the student! As you and I both know, students come 1st (you have shown that time after time in your posts). My post was to inform the student that what they wrote was not very clear and rather deciding on what they meant to write I felt that it was best to inform them that they need to be more careful.
My post was to inform the student that what they wrote was not very clear and rather [than] deciding on what they meant to write I felt that it was best to inform them that they need to be more careful.
And I was adding more information to that. You didn't make it clear how we identify what is the radicand and what is the numerator; I wanted to state that explicitly.
And, again, I wanted to state more clearly than you that what they wrote was not at all clear. You said that it was:
For the record when, you write extremely clearly81 it most certainly is NOT the same as 81. You really need to be clear what you are taking the square root of!
I didn't read Steven's first statement above to mean the op is extremely clear. (He'd advised Barbra to be clear.) I suspect that Steven had been thinking along the lines of, "Even if you were to have clearly written81, that expression is not the same as 81."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.