yaowangatom
New member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2016
- Messages
- 3
can someone explain why the professor took 4 points out of 10 from me?
thanks, professor said he would give us another chance to redo it. if we do it right, he would give us the point back……I do not see anything wrong "mathematically" with your work of calculating f'(x).
However, the question is asking you to evaluate f(x) - and not f'(x). That is a bit strange, but that is what is written for instruction.
So the instructor may have had a different requirement for presentation of your work. You would need to ask the instructor.
evaluating f(x) is not same as looking for f’(x)?I do not see anything wrong "mathematically" with your work of calculating f'(x).
However, the question is asking you to evaluate f(x) - and not f'(x). That is a bit strange, but that is what is written for instruction.
So the instructor may have had a different requirement for presentation of your work. You would need to ask the instructor.
As Subhotosh Khan said, I can't see anything wrong 'mathematically' with your work. The only thing I could think of which might apply is that the answer can be written in 'simpler' formcan someone explain why the professor took 4 points out of 10 from me?
\(\displaystyle 2\left[ {\log \left( {1 + \frac{1}{x}} \right) - \frac{1}{{x + 1}}} \right]{\left( {1 + \frac{1}{x}} \right)^{2x}}\)can someone explain why the professor took 4 points out of 10 from me?
No; plugging a specific alue in for "x" and finding the specific corresponding value of y = f(x) is not at all the same thing as differentiating the function to find the general derivative. :shock:evaluating f(x) is not same as looking for f’(x)?
The wording of this problem is simply terrible!can someone explain why the professor took 4 points out of 10 from me?