How do you solve the posted problem using Rouche's theorem--Complex Analysis

Steven G

Elite Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
14,591
Let f(z) and g(z) be analytic functions on the bounded domain D that extend continuously to dD and satisfies |f(z) +g(z)| < If(z)|+ Ig(z)| on dD. Show that f(z) and g(z) have the same number of zeros in D, counting multiplicity

I can prove that f(z) and g(z) have no zeros.
At that point I am lost.
Any hints/solutions would be helpful.
 
Let f(z) and g(z) be analytic functions on the bounded domain D that extend continuously to dD and satisfies |f(z) +g(z)| < If(z)|+ Ig(z)| on dD. Show that f(z) and g(z) have the same number of zeros in D, counting multiplicity

I can prove that f(z) and g(z) have no zeros.
At that point I am lost.
Any hints/solutions would be helpful.
I'm unsure whether this can help, but this is a summary of complex functions:
It has residue formulas, some tricks, and examples. The residue theorem appears to be called for, maybe applied to f±g. f\pm g. But I miss the point where the strict triangle inequality kicks in. Don't we have z1+z2z1+z2 |z_1+z_2| \leq |z_1|+|z_2| for any complex numbers? So how does strictness change the situation? This is all we have. At least it rules out f=cg. f=c\cdot g.
 
I have found a theorem (Rouché's theorem) that uses the strict inequality and which might be of help here:

Suppose f f and g g are meromorphic in a neighborhood of B(a;R) \overline{B}(a;R) with no zeros ( ZZ ) or poles ( PP ) on the circle γ={zCza=R}\gamma =\{z\in \mathbb{C}\,|\,|z-a|=R\} . If Zf,Zg,Pf,PgZ_f,Z_g,P_f,P_g are the numbers of zeros, resp. poles, of f f and g g inside γ\gamma counted according to their multiplicities and if
f(z)+g(z)<f(z)+g(z) |f(z)+g(z)|<|f(z)|+|g(z)| on γ, \gamma , then
ZfPf=ZgPg  . Z_f-P_f=Z_g-P_g\;. Proof: From the hypothesis
f(z)g(z)+1<f(z)g(z)+1 \left|\dfrac{f(z)}{g(z)+1}\right|< \left|\dfrac{f(z)}{g(z)}\right|+1 on γ.\gamma . If λ:=f(z)/g(z)\lambda :=f(z)/g(z) and if λ\lambda is a positive real number then this inequality becomes λ+1<λ+1, \lambda +1<\lambda +1, a contradiction. Hence the meromorphic function f/gf/g maps γ\gamma onto Ω:=C[0,).\Omega:=\mathbb{C}-[0,\infty ). If L L is a branch of the logarithm on Ω\Omega then L(f(z)(g(z))L(f(z)(g(z)) is a well-defined primitive for (f/g)(f/g)1(f/g)\,'(f/g)^{-1} in a neighborhood of γ.\gamma . Thus
0=12πiγ(f/g)(f/g)1=12πiγ(ffgg)=(ZfPf)(ZgPg).\begin{array}{lll} 0&= \dfrac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\gamma (f/g)\,'(f/g)^{-1} \\[12pt] &= \dfrac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\gamma \left(\dfrac{f\,'}{f}-\dfrac{g\,'}{g}\right)\\[12pt] &= (Z_f-P_f)-(Z_g-P_g). \end{array}
 
Let f(z) and g(z) be analytic functions on the bounded domain D that extend continuously to dD and satisfies |f(z) +g(z)| < If(z)|+ Ig(z)| on dD. Show that f(z) and g(z) have the same number of zeros in D, counting multiplicity

I can prove that f(z) and g(z) have no zeros.
At that point I am lost.
Any hints/solutions would be helpful.

I am very rusty on complex analysis, but is not your problem equivalent to the symmetric version of Rouche's theorem in Wikipedia's page ?
 
Top