i hate modulus

burgerandcheese

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
85
SmartSelect_20200711-014551_Drive.jpg

I need help with 10(iii).
I can only get the correct answers (my working is below) if I get rid of the modulus, otherwise I'd get two values of x? how do I know we can get rid of the modulus? is x ≤ 20 ?

IMG-20200711-WA0000.jpg
 
What would the other solution be?

What happens if x is ever equal to 20?

What does that imply about the solution?

After you've figured that out, try graphing x(t), taking the absolute value into account.

By the way, the modulus is your friend. Without it, some problems would have no solutions ...
 
Yes, dx/dt would be zero, so nothing would ever change. So you can't "cross over" x=20 at any point, can you?

What if you plug x=20 into the equation you got (with ln)?

Then go ahead and graph the family of solutions.
 
GIVEN

[MATH]\dfrac{dx}{dt} = x'(t) = k(20 - x\}, \ x(0) = 0, \text { and} x'(0) = 1.[/MATH]
[MATH]\therefore 1 = k\{20 - x(0)\} \implies 20k = 1 \implies k = 0.05\implies\\ x' = 0.05(20 - x) \implies \dfrac{dx}{dt} = \dfrac{20 - x}{20}.[/MATH]Straightforward. We have an obviously separable equation.

[MATH]\int \dfrac{dx}{20 - x} = \int \dfrac{dt}{20} = 0.05 \int dt \implies\\ - \int \dfrac{-dx}{20 - x} = 0.05t \int dt \implies \\ - ln\{|c_1(20 - x)|\}= 0.05t \implies |c_1(20 - x)| = e^{-0.05t}.[/MATH]Can x be negative? No, that would make no sense in terms of the physical situation being described. But x can be zero. So we need to look at the case 0 < x < 20.

Can x ever = 20? No, because then the LHS would be zero so that t would have to be inifinite to make the RHS zero also. In other words, x starts at 0 but can never get to 20. That is what Dr. Peterson meant when he said there could be no "cross over." We can ignore x > 20.

[MATH]\therefore 0 \le x < 20 \implies c_1(20 - x) = e^{-0.05t} \implies \\ c_1(20 - 0) = e^{-0.05(0)} \implies 20c_1 = 1 \implies c_1 = 0.05 \implies \\ 0.05(20 - x) = e^{-0.05t} \implies x = 20 - 20e^{-0.05t} \implies [/MATH]Now let's check.

[MATH]\therefore \dfrac{dx}{dt} = 0 - 20e^{-0.05t}(-0.05) = e^{-0.05t} = 0.05(20 - x) \ \checkmark.[/MATH]
 
Last edited:
I think that the last line in your work is wrong

[math] t=20ln(\dfrac{20}{20-x})[/math]
If t=0, then [math] 20ln(\dfrac{20}{20-x})[/math] = 0 so [math] ln(\dfrac{20}{20-x})[/math] = 0 and [math] \dfrac{20}{20-x}[/math] = 1. But this means x=0, not x=20
 
You are thinking of the modulus the wrong way. In calculus, students are taught to give the final solutions that way. But in differential equations, initial value problems such as this, it is wrong to have the modulus. For your answer you must choose only one "piece", the one indicated by the initial values.
 
Top