Hello,
I want to show by using a monotone class argument that the following equality (i.e. it is a martingale) holds for all bounded and Gs-measurable random variables Ys:
E[Ys(Wt−Ws)]=0, s≤t. (*)
where W is an Fs Brownian motion (and it follows from (*) also a Gs Brownian motion).
Gs is the enlargement of the filtration Fs by the filtration generated by a r.v. X. So far I have shown that
(*) holds for Ys=f(X)Hs where f is bounded and measurable; and Hs is bounded and Fs-measurable. Now, I think I need a monotone class argument in order to show that (*) holds for all bounded and Gs-measurbale random variables.
But unfortunately I am not very familiar in using monotone class arguments.
How do I find the sets needed in the monotone class theorem?
Thanks in advance.
I want to show by using a monotone class argument that the following equality (i.e. it is a martingale) holds for all bounded and Gs-measurable random variables Ys:
E[Ys(Wt−Ws)]=0, s≤t. (*)
where W is an Fs Brownian motion (and it follows from (*) also a Gs Brownian motion).
Gs is the enlargement of the filtration Fs by the filtration generated by a r.v. X. So far I have shown that
(*) holds for Ys=f(X)Hs where f is bounded and measurable; and Hs is bounded and Fs-measurable. Now, I think I need a monotone class argument in order to show that (*) holds for all bounded and Gs-measurbale random variables.
But unfortunately I am not very familiar in using monotone class arguments.
How do I find the sets needed in the monotone class theorem?
Thanks in advance.