vampirewitchreine
Junior Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
- Messages
- 82
Okay, so this one was throwing me off for a bit, but I think that I might have this one down. If you would be ever so kind to check this and make sure that my reasonings are good, I would greatly appreciate it.
(Black are from the book, red is the information that I filled in)

Given: segment AE || segment DC, segment AB is congruent to segment DB
Prove: ▲ABE is congruent to ▲DCB
Okay, so my reasonings for #1 and #2 are obvious.
I chose to use that segment EB was congruent to BC by the definition of midpoint in #3 as B would need to be the midpoint of AD to make both smaller segments (AB and DB) congruent to each other.
For #4, You have sides that are congruent to corresponding parts of the other triangle with an angle between the two sides that is also congruent to the corresponding part of another triangle.
(Black are from the book, red is the information that I filled in)

Given: segment AE || segment DC, segment AB is congruent to segment DB
Prove: ▲ABE is congruent to ▲DCB
Statement | Reason |
1. segment AE || segment DC, segment AB is congruent to segment DB | 1. Given |
2. angle ABE is congruent to angle DBC | 2. Vertical angles are congruent |
3. segment EB is congruent to segment BC | 3. Definition of midpoint |
4. ▲ABE is congruent to ▲DBC | 4. SAS |
Okay, so my reasonings for #1 and #2 are obvious.
I chose to use that segment EB was congruent to BC by the definition of midpoint in #3 as B would need to be the midpoint of AD to make both smaller segments (AB and DB) congruent to each other.
For #4, You have sides that are congruent to corresponding parts of the other triangle with an angle between the two sides that is also congruent to the corresponding part of another triangle.