\(\displaystyle \text{Prove, using DeMoivre's theorem: }\:\sin2\theta \:=\:2\sin\theta\cos\theta\)
Hello, Relz!
From DeMoivre's theorem, we have: .\(\displaystyle e^{i\theta} \:=\:\cos\theta + i\sin\theta\;\;[1]\)
. . Hence:.\(\displaystyle e^{i(2\theta)} \:=\:\cos2\theta + i\sin2\theta \:=\:e^{2i\theta}\;\;[2]\)
Square [1]: .\(\displaystyle (e^{i\theta})^2 \:=\\cos\theta + i\sin\theta)^2 \:=\
\cos^2\!\theta - \sin^2\!\theta) + (2\sin\theta\cos\theta)i \:=\:e^{2i\theta}\;\;[3]\)
Equate [2] and [3]: .\(\displaystyle \cos2\theta + i\sin2\theta \:=\\cos^2\!\theta - \sin^2\!\theta) + (2\sin\theta\cos\theta)i\)
Equate real and imaginary components: .\(\displaystyle \begin{Bmatrix}\cos2\theta &=& \cos^2\!\theta - \sin^2\!\theta \\ \sin2\theta &=& 2\sin\theta\cos\theta \end{Bmatrix}\)
Do you understand that if \(\displaystyle a+bi=x+yi\) then \(\displaystyle x=a~\&~y=b~?\)I'm sorry but I don't really understand what you're doing. Could you explain it?
Do you understand that if \(\displaystyle a+bi=x+yi\) then \(\displaystyle x=a~\&~y=b~?\)
If you do then:
\(\displaystyle (cos(\theta)+i\sin(\theta))^2=cos(2\theta)+i\sin(2\theta)\)
OR
\(\displaystyle cos^2(\theta)-\sin^2(\theta)+2cos(\theta)\sin(\theta)i=cos(2\theta)+i\sin(2\theta)\)
So \(\displaystyle \sin(2\theta)=2cos(\theta)\sin(\theta)\)
I'm sorry but I just don't get how you go from the first equation to the next step. Also, it's 2sin (theta) cos (theta), not the other way around. Unless it doesn't matter..in which case, forget you read that last bit![]()
FROM EULER'S THEOREM :
e to the power of (i times theta) = Cos(theta) + i Sin (theta)
Digest & Accept it as is please - It can be proven in Calculus by use of Taylor's Expansion
Are you really saying that you are trying to prove this, and you don't know that \(\displaystyle \cos(x)\sin(x)=\sin(x)\cos(x)~?\).Also, it's 2sin (theta) cos (theta), not the other way around.
Are you really saying that you are trying to prove this, and you don't know that \(\displaystyle \cos(x)\sin(x)=\sin(x)\cos(x)~?\).
Surely you are not questioning that multiplication is commutative?