given set B = {x^2+2x-3} where x is a real number
I needed to prove the existence of the infimum. The definition I used was "Greatest lower bound property tells us that every non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded from below has an infimum."
I know the correct answer is -4. I proved this through finding a critical point and then using the first derivative test to show it is a minimum.
I then went on to justify why -4 is the greatest lower bound by saying:
1) To prove that -4 is the greatest lower bound, we will prove that -4 is the absolute minimum. That is because, by definition the absolute minimum is the smallest value that the function can have over its entire curve.
2) The function g(x) is a second-degree polynomial where the leading coefficient is positive. This means that the graph is a parabola and is concave up, with no endpoints.
3) And so, g(x) approaches infinity as x goes to positive infinity. g(x) approaches infinity as x goes to negative infinity.
4) Thus, g(x) is greater than or equal to -4, for all x, where x is a real number.
I got the feedback from my evaluater saying,
"it was not evident how this work related to the definition of infimum or to the intended approach using "every non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded from below has an infimum".
What else do I need to add to my justification?
I needed to prove the existence of the infimum. The definition I used was "Greatest lower bound property tells us that every non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded from below has an infimum."
I know the correct answer is -4. I proved this through finding a critical point and then using the first derivative test to show it is a minimum.
I then went on to justify why -4 is the greatest lower bound by saying:
1) To prove that -4 is the greatest lower bound, we will prove that -4 is the absolute minimum. That is because, by definition the absolute minimum is the smallest value that the function can have over its entire curve.
2) The function g(x) is a second-degree polynomial where the leading coefficient is positive. This means that the graph is a parabola and is concave up, with no endpoints.
3) And so, g(x) approaches infinity as x goes to positive infinity. g(x) approaches infinity as x goes to negative infinity.
4) Thus, g(x) is greater than or equal to -4, for all x, where x is a real number.
I got the feedback from my evaluater saying,
"it was not evident how this work related to the definition of infimum or to the intended approach using "every non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded from below has an infimum".
What else do I need to add to my justification?