Who told you this was incorrect? Of course, given any ratio involving rational numbers, we can always change to a ratio that uses only whole numbers. But whether or not "ratios" (which simply means a comparison of numbers) must use only whole numbers is a matter of convention,Why should whole numbers be used with ratios?
Correct ratios include 8:1, 2:5, and 1:100. Incorrect ratios include 2.5:10, 1:4.5, and 3 1/2:100.
Who told you this was incorrect? Of course, given any ratio involving rational numbers, we can always change to a ratio that uses only whole numbers. But whether or not "ratios" (which simply means a comparison of numbers) must use only whole numbers is a matter of convention,Why should whole numbers be used with ratios?
Correct ratios include 8:1, 2:5, and 1:100. Incorrect ratios include 2.5:10, 1:4.5, and 3 1/2:100.
Why not?
I saw it at the following: http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/site...4/Chapte03.pdf
See 3.2 page 62.
Maybe the key to the statement is contained in the opening remark "As a healthcare professional, you will need to know how to determine the amount of drug contained in a quantity of a ..." Possibly it is standard for someone in the healthcare industry to only use whole numbers for ratios but it is not a mathematical truth. As an example of that fact, consider the statement found in many mathematical texts "Pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to the diameter.". That is, C : D as Pi : 1 which can not be expressed as a whole number ratio.