MathNugget
Junior Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2024
- Messages
- 195
I'm running out of creative names. I decided to skip some stuff from the paper I mentioned earlier .
I'd like to prove: (X2+tX+q,p)Z[X]/pZ[X]Z[X]/pZ[X]≃pZ[α]Z[α]
now, the exercise needs a bit more input: the polynomial (X2+tX+q ) is irreducible in Z[X] (of course, it is in Q[X] too). α is one of the roots (it is in C\Q ).
I am trying to find a surjective morphism ϕ:pZ[X]Z[X]→pZ[α]Z[α].
ϕ(f)=f(α). I'll assume believed that Z[α] are a+bα, with a,b∈Z . There is the surjectivity, and then there is the morphism: ϕ(f+g)=(f+g)(α)=f(α)+g(α)=ϕ(f)+ϕ(g). Multiplication seems to go similarly. I realize I didn't really put the hats properly, maybe...
For correct definiteness...if p∣(f−g), then p∣(f(α)−g(α)) I suppose.
Now I need to prove ker(ϕ)=pZ[X](X2+tX+q,p)Z[X].
If ϕ(f)=0, then p∣f(α) in Z[α]. Notice: that means either f(α)=0, or f(X) has all coefficients divisible by p.
(Suppose g(α)=kp; then α would be root of g-kp would be a polynomial of same degree as f, with root α, which contradicts the uniqueness of f, which I didn't prove here. I suppose we can find some integers c, d such that deg(cf−d(g−kp))≤1, has integer coefficients, and root α, which contradicts it being irrational etc).
As such, f(X)∈(X2+tX+q,p)Z[X] (I guess this can be proven with double inclusion: on one hand, I proved that f satisfies at least on of these: f(α)=0 or p∣f(x)∀x; on other hand, an element of (X2+tX+q,p)Z[X] is of the form g1(X2+tX+q)+g2p, and obviously (g1(X2+tX+q)+g2p)(α)=0+pg2(α), which is divizible by p... g1,g2 are arbitrary elements of Z[X], by the way...
Then I remember ϕ was defined on pZ[X]Z[X], so I get that ker(ϕ)=pZ[X](X2+tX+q,p)Z[X], and it should be complete...
I'd like to prove: (X2+tX+q,p)Z[X]/pZ[X]Z[X]/pZ[X]≃pZ[α]Z[α]
now, the exercise needs a bit more input: the polynomial (X2+tX+q ) is irreducible in Z[X] (of course, it is in Q[X] too). α is one of the roots (it is in C\Q ).
I am trying to find a surjective morphism ϕ:pZ[X]Z[X]→pZ[α]Z[α].
ϕ(f)=f(α). I'll assume believed that Z[α] are a+bα, with a,b∈Z . There is the surjectivity, and then there is the morphism: ϕ(f+g)=(f+g)(α)=f(α)+g(α)=ϕ(f)+ϕ(g). Multiplication seems to go similarly. I realize I didn't really put the hats properly, maybe...
For correct definiteness...if p∣(f−g), then p∣(f(α)−g(α)) I suppose.
Now I need to prove ker(ϕ)=pZ[X](X2+tX+q,p)Z[X].
If ϕ(f)=0, then p∣f(α) in Z[α]. Notice: that means either f(α)=0, or f(X) has all coefficients divisible by p.
(Suppose g(α)=kp; then α would be root of g-kp would be a polynomial of same degree as f, with root α, which contradicts the uniqueness of f, which I didn't prove here. I suppose we can find some integers c, d such that deg(cf−d(g−kp))≤1, has integer coefficients, and root α, which contradicts it being irrational etc).
As such, f(X)∈(X2+tX+q,p)Z[X] (I guess this can be proven with double inclusion: on one hand, I proved that f satisfies at least on of these: f(α)=0 or p∣f(x)∀x; on other hand, an element of (X2+tX+q,p)Z[X] is of the form g1(X2+tX+q)+g2p, and obviously (g1(X2+tX+q)+g2p)(α)=0+pg2(α), which is divizible by p... g1,g2 are arbitrary elements of Z[X], by the way...
Then I remember ϕ was defined on pZ[X]Z[X], so I get that ker(ϕ)=pZ[X](X2+tX+q,p)Z[X], and it should be complete...