Ring isomorphism involving polynomials

MathNugget

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
195
I'm running out of creative names. I decided to skip some stuff from the paper I mentioned earlier .

I'd like to prove: Z[X]/pZ[X](X2+tX+q,p)Z[X]/pZ[X]Z[α]pZ[α]\frac{\mathbb{Z}[X]/p\mathbb{Z}[X]}{(X^2+tX+q, p)\mathbb{Z}[X]/p\mathbb{Z}[X]}\simeq \frac{\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]}{p\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]}

now, the exercise needs a bit more input: the polynomial (X2+tX+qX^2+tX+q ) is irreducible in Z[X]\mathbb{Z}[X] (of course, it is in Q[X]\mathbb{Q}[X] too). α\alpha is one of the roots (it is in C\Q\mathbb{C}\backslash \mathbb{Q} ).

I am trying to find a surjective morphism ϕ:Z[X]pZ[X]Z[α]pZ[α]\phi: \frac{\mathbb{Z}[X]}{p\mathbb{Z}[X]} \rightarrow \frac{\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]}{p\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]}.

ϕ(f^)=f(α)^\phi(\widehat{f})=\widehat{f(\alpha)}. I'll assume believed that Z[α]\mathbb{Z}[\alpha] are a+bαa+b\alpha, with a,bZa, b \in \mathbb{Z} . There is the surjectivity, and then there is the morphism: ϕ(f+g^)=(f+g)(α)^=f(α)+g(α)^=ϕ(f)+ϕ(g)^\phi(\widehat{f+g})=\widehat{(f+g)(\alpha)}=\widehat{f(\alpha)+g(\alpha)}=\widehat{\phi(f)+\phi(g)}. Multiplication seems to go similarly. I realize I didn't really put the hats properly, maybe...


For correct definiteness...if p(fg)p \mid (f-g), then p(f(α)g(α))p \mid (f(\alpha)-g(\alpha)) I suppose.

Now I need to prove ker(ϕ)=(X2+tX+q,p)Z[X]pZ[X]ker(\phi)=\frac{(X^2+tX+q, p)\mathbb{Z}[X]}{p\mathbb{Z}[X]}.

If ϕ(f^)=0^\phi(\widehat{f})=\widehat{0}, then pf(α)p \mid f(\alpha) in Z[α]\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]. Notice: that means either f(α)=0f(\alpha)=0, or f(X)f(X) has all coefficients divisible by p.

(Suppose g(α)=kpg(\alpha)=kp; then α\alpha would be root of g-kp would be a polynomial of same degree as f, with root α\alpha, which contradicts the uniqueness of f, which I didn't prove here. I suppose we can find some integers c, d such that deg(cfd(gkp))1deg(cf-d(g-kp))\leq 1, has integer coefficients, and root α\alpha, which contradicts it being irrational etc).

As such, f(X)(X2+tX+q,p)Z[X]f(X) \in (X^2+tX+q, p)\mathbb{Z}[X] (I guess this can be proven with double inclusion: on one hand, I proved that f satisfies at least on of these: f(α)=0f(\alpha)=0 or pf(x)xp \mid f(x) \: \forall x; on other hand, an element of (X2+tX+q,p)Z[X](X^2+tX+q, p)\mathbb{Z}[X] is of the form g1(X2+tX+q)+g2pg_1(X^2+tX+q)+g_2p, and obviously (g1(X2+tX+q)+g2p)(α)=0+pg2(α)(g_1(X^2+tX+q)+g_2p)(\alpha)=0+pg_2(\alpha), which is divizible by p... g1,g2g_1, g_2 are arbitrary elements of Z[X]\mathbb{Z}[X], by the way...


Then I remember ϕ\phi was defined on Z[X]pZ[X]\frac{\mathbb{Z}[X]}{p\mathbb{Z}[X]}, so I get that ker(ϕ)=(X2+tX+q,p)Z[X]pZ[X]ker(\phi)=\frac{(X^2+tX+q, p)\mathbb{Z}[X]}{p\mathbb{Z}[X]}, and it should be complete...
 
I wish you success in your exercise, but if you need help from us you will have to formulate your questions in a more self-contained way which does not require reading an esoteric article. Particularly, I have no clue what you second line means :(
 
I wish you success in your exercise, but if you need help from us you will have to formulate your questions in a more self-contained way which does not require reading an esoteric article. Particularly, I have no clue what you second line means :(
Well...
It means
A=Z[X]pZ[X]A=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[X]}{p\mathbb{Z}[X]}, B=(X2+tX+q,p)Z[X]pZ[X]B=\frac{(X^2+tX+q, p)\mathbb{Z}[X]}{p\mathbb{Z}[X]}
And I am looking at
ABZ[α]pZ[α]\frac{A}{B}\simeq \frac{\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]}{p\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]} .

p is a prime number (in Z\mathbb{Z} ), X2+tX+qZ[X]X^2+tX+q \in \mathbb{Z}[X], with roots α,αZ\alpha, \overline{\alpha} \notin \mathbb{Z}.


And I decided to approach the problem by finding a morphism ϕ:AZ[α]pZ[α]\phi: A \rightarrow \frac{\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]}{p\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]} that is surjective and has ker(ϕ)=Bker(\phi)=B
 
Last edited:
Top