solving roots of complex numbers

Relz

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 2011
Messages
49
(2 + i)z2 - (l+i)z + 2i = 0

I have multiplied the z through each bracket but then i'm stuck. any ideas?
 
(2 + i)z2 - (l+i)z + 2i = 0

I have multiplied the z through each bracket but then i'm stuck. any ideas?

Take z = a + b i

then you'll end up smt. like

f(a,b) + g(a,b)*i = 0 + 0*i

Take f(a,b)=g(a,b)=0
 
(2 + i)z2 - (l+i)z + 2i = 0

I have multiplied the z through each bracket but then i'm stuck. any ideas?

If z is a complex number , it ought to be smt. like a+bi=z

z**2=a**2+2abi-b**2 Right ?

then


( 2 + i ) ( a**2+2abi-b**2)-(1+i)(a+bi)+2i=0


2a**2+4abi-2b**2+a**2 i -2ab -i b**2 -[(a+bi+ai-b)+2i=0


take reals and i-containing terms side by side

2a**2-2b**2-2ab-a+b=0 Right ?

AND

4ab+a**2-b**2-b-a+2=0
 
If z is a complex number , it ought to be smt. like a+bi=z

z**2=a**2+2abi-b**2 Right ?

then


( 2 + i ) ( a**2+2abi-b**2)-(1+i)(a+bi)+2i=0


2a**2+4abi-2b**2+a**2 i -2ab -i b**2 -[(a+bi+ai-b)+2i=0


take reals and i-containing terms side by side

2a**2-2b**2-2ab-a+b=0 Right ?

AND

4ab+a**2-b**2-b-a+2=0

I am supposed to solve for z
 
I am supposed to solve for z

Well, You are supposed to find a and b which in return constitute in [z = a + b i] fashion

PS: I hope to come out with a better sol'n towards the end of the day . I may be posting it soon :)

Best of Luck !
 
Last edited:
Hello, Relz!

\(\displaystyle (2 + i)z^2 - (1+i)z + 2i \:=\: 0\)

You have a quadratic equation.
How about using the Quadratic Formula?

\(\displaystyle z \;=\;\dfrac{(1+i) \pm \sqrt{(1+i)^2 - 4(2+i)(2i)}}{2(2+i)} \;=\;\dfrac{(1+i) \pm\sqrt{8-14i}}{2(2+i)} \)
 
Alas, that's exactly what I said, Soroban, but no one paid any attention. :confused:
 
Could Someone Please Provide the Proof that the Quadratic Formulae would work for an equation having complex numbers as coefficients .

Thank You !
 
Could Someone Please Provide the Proof that the Quadratic Formulae would work for an equation having complex numbers as coefficients .

Thank You !

There is no reason not to work. Derivation of quadratic formula requires completing the square and finding square root - which is valid for all numbers (real or complex).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is reason not to work. Derivation of quadratic formula requires completing the square and finding square root - which is valid for all numbers (real or complex).

Yes, Thank You, but Still how can one prove this in mathematical premises?
 
Yes, Thank You, but Still how can one prove this in mathematical premises?

I suggest, you go through the derivation - and point out which step will not be valid for complex numbers. It is valid for sin(Θ), cos(Θ), ln(x), ex - why not for complex coefficients.

(a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2

is valid for all a & b - real and complex. You can prove that by using FOIL.

Thus I do not see any step in derivation that will exclude complex coefficients.
 
I suggest, you go through the derivation - and point out which step will not be valid for complex numbers. It is valid for sin(Θ), cos(Θ), ln(x), ex - why not for complex coefficients.

(a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2

is valid for all a & b - real and complex. You can prove that by using FOIL.

Thus I do not see any step in derivation that will exclude complex coefficients.

Exactly, nothing in the standard proof uses a property of the real numbers which does not hold for complex numbers (there are some properties for elements in R which do not hold in C).

Here is the proof I mean, assume a is not 0 then:

\(\displaystyle ax^2+bx+c \,\,=\,\, 0 \iff x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x \,\,=\,\, -\frac{c}{a}\,\, \iff \)

\(\displaystyle x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x + \frac{b^2}{4a^2} \,\,=\,\, \frac{-4ac + b^2}{4a^2} \,\,\iff \)

\(\displaystyle (x+\frac{b}{2a})^2 \,\,= \,\,\frac{-4ac + b^2}{4a^2} \,\,\iff\)

\(\displaystyle x+\frac{b}{2a} \,\,= \,\,\pm \frac{\sqrt{-4ac + b^2}}{2a}\)

Then finish from there.

edit: I'm not so sure that simplifying the answer in the complex case is an easy task. It might be that the other method could be easier.
 
Last edited:
edit: I'm not so sure that simplifying the answer in the complex case is an easy task. It might be that the other method could be easier.

using a + ib = r*e

it could be done fairly easily with couple of tan-1 and square roots.
 
Top