Split from Numerical Sequence Brain Strain

Steven G

Elite Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
14,382
ref: https://www.freemathhelp.com/forum/threads/numerical-sequence-brain-strain.121120/#post-487240
No, in ALL cases there ARE infinitely many answers to such a question. This is what makes the exercise illogical; although it does give some practice in pattern recognition and various interpolation and extrapolation techniques.

In the case of your five specific problems, and the five specific answer from which to choose, one can construct a rule for ALL FIVE answers to fit ALL FIVE questions. It simply is not appropriate to suggest that a single answer necessarily applies to a single sequence.

Here's one of my favorite examples:

0
14
17
18
24
25
27
32
34
38
39
45
46
47
49
49
49
49
50

What's THE next number? What's THE rule?
Randomness?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, in ALL cases there ARE infinitely many answers to such a question. This is what makes the exercise illogical; although it does give some practice in pattern recognition and various interpolation and extrapolation techniques.

In the case of your five specific problems, and the five specific answer from which to choose, one can construct a rule for ALL FIVE answers to fit ALL FIVE questions. It simply is not appropriate to suggest that a single answer necessarily applies to a single sequence.

Here's one of my favorite examples:

0
14
17
18
24
25
27
32
34
38
39
45
46
47
49
49
49
49
50

What's THE next number? What's THE rule?
My favorite one is:

2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 57, .....
 
If I learned one thing on this forum it is that there is a rule, well actually many many rules.
Okay, it deserves more information. The next 5 values are 50, 50, 50, 50, 50.
 
Oh boy, there you go again messing up. The last two numbers you listed should be 32 and 64. If only Sal had tutored you!
Yes ... if only the sequence is an = 2^n

However, this sequence is more insidious......

In this case,

an = 1/24 * [(n+1)4 - 6(n+1)3 + 23(n+1)2 - 18(n+1) + 24]
 
To our lovely Super Moderator Subhotosh Khan: Can you please make a separate post for your problem. Thank you very much. If you keep this up I will have to tell Salman about you.
BTW, have a great day.
 
No, in ALL cases there ARE infinitely many answers to such a question. This is what makes the exercise illogical; although it does give some practice in pattern recognition and various interpolation and extrapolation techniques.

In the case of your five specific problems, and the five specific answers from which to choose, one can construct a rule for ALL FIVE answers to fit ALL FIVE questions. It simply is not appropriate to suggest that a single answer necessarily applies to a single sequence.

Here's one of my favorite examples:

0
14
17
18
24
25
27
32
34
38
39
45
46
47
49
49
49
49
50

What's THE next number? What's THE rule?
I think it's 3 + 2i.

-Dan
 
To our lovely Super Moderator Subhotosh Khan: Can you please make a separate post for your problem. Thank you very much. If you keep this up I will have to tell Salman about you.
BTW, have a great day.
Wrong noun - it is an example of the question on the table - not a problem.

Although, I did put a question mark (?) at the end - it is a well-known example of follies of extrapolation (induction) - at least for us non-believer engineers.
 
Is the answer more randomness?
# of states/commonwealths in the USA, at each decade since 1790. Originally, I quit at 1950. There is a little fudging with 1870, as well. The next value won't exist for 10 years. Just an example of a "mathematical" list that has no "mathematical" basis.
 
Top