Nemesis10192
New member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2014
- Messages
- 6
Consider f_m(x)= sum from 1 to infinity of [ (x^n)/(n^m)].
I am asked: for each m in the naturals, find all x in the reals for which the formula f_m defines a function.
But surely for each m in the naturals, any x in the reals defines a function? I don't see why there need be any restrictions. Am I being thick?
The next part asks for m>=2, let x be such that f_m(x) is convergent. Compute f'_m and ensure that you fully justify your answer...
So I was thinking, employ the ratio test to conclude f_m(x) is convergent iff |x|<1. Then check the conditions of some main theorem on differentiability of power series in my notes hold and then I can differentiate in the normal way (since m=/=1).
But mainly the first part...why should there be any restrictions on x? Am I missing something?
I am asked: for each m in the naturals, find all x in the reals for which the formula f_m defines a function.
But surely for each m in the naturals, any x in the reals defines a function? I don't see why there need be any restrictions. Am I being thick?
The next part asks for m>=2, let x be such that f_m(x) is convergent. Compute f'_m and ensure that you fully justify your answer...
So I was thinking, employ the ratio test to conclude f_m(x) is convergent iff |x|<1. Then check the conditions of some main theorem on differentiability of power series in my notes hold and then I can differentiate in the normal way (since m=/=1).
But mainly the first part...why should there be any restrictions on x? Am I missing something?