Volume calculation is exponential if you either use the lowest or highest denominations

[Earthgaia]

Ok, so the simple volume calculation everywhere is w x l x h but there is a massive problem with this.
For a chair I was able to use nano meters to find that a 85h 45w 52d chair was 2 light years cubed for nano meters or either simply close to 0 meters cubed for light year distance to put it bluntly

1 billion meters for a nano meter
850,000,000 nano meters
450,000,000 nano meters
520,000,000 nano meters
198,900,000,000,000,000 m cubed
198,900,000,000,000 km cubed
2.1025 light years cubed

Light year 9.46 trillion kilometers
0.0000000000000898520084566596194503171247 Light years
0.0000000000000475687103594080338266384778 Light years
0.000000000000054968287526427061310782241 Light years
0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000002349423854178295983086680760466
0.000000000000000000000000000002222 meters cubed

I am eager to see the response this leads to the problem that either there is a calumniation to appropriate the denomination but what exact denomination as they are all disproportionally represented on the scale of relativistic value. For example if you move them all to "meters" it would make nano meter calculations inaccurate.

 

[Earthgaia]

I should add the initial denomination is in cm

 

[Earthgaia]

85cm h 45cm w 52cm d
198,900 cm cubed
198.9 meters cubed
.1989 km or 0.2 km cubed

Clearly a chair is not 0.2 km cubed

But none of those answers make any sense

But then you take the factors and turn them into each volume square like this.
85cm h 45cm w 52cm d

45 cm cubed lowest factor
28 12 12 the rest
12 lowest factor
9.3 9.3 9.3 share rest volume
9.3 lowest factor
66.3 cm cubed

 

[Earthgaia]

Or rather

85cm h 45cm w 52cm d
45 cm cubed lowest factor
28 12 12 the rest (40 12 shared into 3)
12 lowest factor
5.3 5.3 5.3 share rest volume (16 shared into 3)
5.3 lowest factor
62.3 cm cubed

 

[Earthgaia]

Actually
85cm h 45cm w 52cm d
198,900 cm cubed
1989 meters cubed
1.989 km or 2 km cubed
Clearly a chair is not 2 km cubed

 

[Earthgaia]

Area is also wrong for example 2d 20 x 20 square
20
20
400 cm squared
However it is actually
20 cm squared

20 x 20 2D Square
20,000,000,000 nano meters
20,000,000,000 nano meters
Equals
400,000,000,000 cm squared
or it could simply be 20 2D (dimensional) square cm
20 cm squared

 

[Earthgaia]

Area is also wrong for example 2d 20cm x 20cm square (corrected)
20
20
400 cm squared
However it is actually
20 cm squared
20
200,000,000 nano meters
200,000,000 nano meters
40,000,000,000,000,000 nano meters squared
4,000,000,000 cm squared
or it could simply be 20 2 dimensional square cms
20 cm squared

 

[Earthgaia]

20 x 20 =400 cm squared
my Solution divide or multiply denomination factor 3 times for cubed or 2 twice for 2d

 

[HallsofIvy]

I suspect you have gotten no responses because no one can make sense of this!

In your first post you say "For a chair I was able to use nano meters to find that a 85h 45w 52d chair was 2 light years cubed for nano meters". That makes no sense because a chair 85 cm by 45 cm by 52 cm is 85*10,000,000 nanometers by 45*10,000,000 nanometers* 52*10,000,000 nanometer= (85*45*52)x 10^{21)= 198900 x 10^{21}= 1.989x 10^{26} nanometers cubed so approximately 2 x 10^{26} cubic nanometers. Okay that's where you got the "2" but where did you get "light years cubed"? One light year is approximately 10^{16} meters so "light years cubed" is about 10^{32} cubic meters.