Why is the reference angle always positive?

pope4

New member
Joined
Mar 21, 2022
Messages
28
I was doing a trig question asking to find the reference angle of -500 degrees. I got the right number (40), but when I checked with the answer key it said that it was positive, which got me thinking: why is the reference angle in this situation positive if the original angle is negative? And if that's the case, why isn't the reference angle of 500 degrees -40?
 
The flaw with your argument that the reference should be negative is because the location of -500 is the same as -500 + 360 + 360 = +220. Now the reference angle for -500 and +220 are the same.

When you draw the triangle, in quadrant 3 for this particular angle, the angles are all positive as ALL angles in a triangle are positive.
 
I was doing a trig question asking to find the reference angle of -500 degrees. I got the right number (40), but when I checked with the answer key it said that it was positive, which got me thinking: why is the reference angle in this situation positive if the original angle is negative? And if that's the case, why isn't the reference angle of 500 degrees -40?
By definition: the Reference Angle is the acute angle between the terminal arm/terminal side of the angle concerned and the x-axis. The reference angle is always positive!

In other words, the reference angle is the angle 'sandwiched' between any angle and the x-axis. It must be less than (or equal to) 90 degrees, and always positive. (Even if it "lies" in the 3rd or 4th
quadrant).
 
I was doing a trig question asking to find the reference angle of -500 degrees. I got the right number (40), but when I checked with the answer key it said that it was positive, which got me thinking: why is the reference angle in this situation positive if the original angle is negative? And if that's the case, why isn't the reference angle of 500 degrees -40?
What definition were you given for "reference angle"?

The way I understand it, it is defined as the positive acute angle between the terminal ray and the x-axis. See, for example, here.

That's just the definition; no reason is needed! But one could give good reasons for preferring this ... such as the way the concept is used.
 
Top