Polynomials of the 4th order, basis

God

New member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
27
Hi.

Let P4 represent all the polynomials of the 4th order : a+bx+cx²+dx3+ex4.
We have E={P∈P4, P(1)=0 and P(-1)=0}

-Show that P(t) =
a+bx+cx²+dx3+ex4 ∈ E if and only if (a,b,c,d,e) is the solution of a linear system :

Ok so we have a+b+c+d+e=0 and a-b+c-d+e=0, which gives a+c+e=0 and b+d=0

-Solve the system and give a basis of the E space :

So the system has too many unknown values, I'm not sure how the solution can be shown... either as
a+c+e=0 and b+d=0, or a=-c-e and b=-d... something along the lines I guess

My problem lies in finding the basis

I thought I'd do it that way : (a,b,c,d,e) = (-c-e,-d,c,d,e) = c*(-1,0,1,0,0) + d*(0,-1,0,1,0) + e*(-1,0,0,0,1)

So the basis would be (
(-1,0,1,0,0),(0,-1,0,1,0),(-1,0,0,0,1)) (these are three vectors)
but I feel like something's missing... since these vectors don't make polynomials !
I don't know where to place the x's, x²'s etc...
Actually I have a hard time transforming my vectors into hybrid polynomial-vectors... because they should be able to form E, that's to say all polynomials of the 4th order with P(1)=0 and P(-1)=0

Any help is very appreciated, thanks for your attention

 
Hi.

Let P4 represent all the polynomials of the 4th order : a+bx+cx²+dx3+ex4.
We have E={P∈P4, P(1)=0 and P(-1)=0}

-Show that P(t) =
a+bx+cx²+dx3+ex4 ∈ E if and only if (a,b,c,d,e) is the solution of a linear system :

Ok so we have a+b+c+d+e=0 and a-b+c-d+e=0, which gives a+c+e=0 and b+d=0

-Solve the system and give a basis of the E space :

So the system has too many unknown values, I'm not sure how the solution can be shown... either as
a+c+e=0 and b+d=0, or a=-c-e and b=-d... something along the lines I guess
If P(1) = 0, then (x - 1) must be a factor of the polynomial,
and if P(-1) = 0 then (x + 1) is also a factor, so the polynomial must be divisible by (x^2 - 1)

This is not new information .. it is totally equivalent to setting \(\displaystyle d = -b\) and \(\displaystyle e = -(a + c)\). That substitution in the original equation leads to something like this: [CHECK THIS CAREFULLY! IT TAKES 5 OR 6 STEPS TO GET HERE.]

\(\displaystyle a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3 + ex^4 = (1 - x^2)[a + bx + (a+c)x^2]\)

The "solution" of a set of 2 equations in 5 unknowns leaves 3 unknowns. Hence you need a set of three linearly independent basis vectors to describe the set E. Does the factored form suggest a set of 3 vectors?
 
By the way, you mean, of course, that P4 is the set of all polynomials of degree 4 or less.
 
By the way, you mean, of course, that P4 is the set of all polynomials of degree 4 or less.

Indeed. 4 or less sorry.

If P(1) = 0, then (x - 1) must be a factor of the polynomial,
and if P(-1) = 0 then (x + 1) is also a factor, so the polynomial must be divisible by (x^2 - 1)

This is not new information .. it is totally equivalent to setting \(\displaystyle d = -b\) and \(\displaystyle e = -(a + c)\). That substitution in the original equation leads to something like this: [CHECK THIS CAREFULLY! IT TAKES 5 OR 6 STEPS TO GET HERE.]

\(\displaystyle a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3 + ex^4 = (1 - x^2)[a + bx + (a+c)x^2]\)

The "solution" of a set of 2 equations in 5 unknowns leaves 3 unknowns. Hence you need a set of three linearly independent basis vectors to describe the set E. Does the factored form suggest a set of 3 vectors?

Okay, I understand how you got the equation : \(\displaystyle a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3 + ex^4 = (1 - x^2)[a + bx + (a+c)x^2]\)
Thanks a lot.

I am, however, still missing the point as to how it will help me to find the vectors.

The only way I was taught to find them was replacing that way : (a,b,c,d,e) = (-c-e,-d,c,d,e) = c*(-1,0,1,0,0) + d*(0,-1,0,1,0) + e*(-1,0,0,0,1)
perhaps what's missing is just the "x's", but I don't know where I should place them
 
Well, you have, at this point, that any polynomial in this set is of the form \(\displaystyle (1- x^2)(ax^2+ bx+ c)\) (I have replaced "a+ c" with just "c". Since a and c are arbitrary constants, so is a+ c.) That tells us that any polynoial in this set can be written as \(\displaystyle a(1-x^2)x^2+ b(1- x^2)x+ c(1- x^2)\). Now, what do you think basis "vectors" are?
 
Indeed. 4 or less sorry.



Okay, I understand how you got the equation : \(\displaystyle a + bx + cx^2 + dx^3 + ex^4 = (1 - x^2)[a + bx + (a+c)x^2]\)
Thanks a lot.

I am, however, still missing the point as to how it will help me to find the vectors.

The only way I was taught to find them was replacing that way : (a,b,c,d,e) = (-c-e,-d,c,d,e) = c*(-1,0,1,0,0) + d*(0,-1,0,1,0) + e*(-1,0,0,0,1)
perhaps what's missing is just the "x's", but I don't know where I should place them
The powers of x are represented by components of the vectors, that is, they define the vector space. The polynomial P4 can be written

\(\displaystyle P4 = \begin{pmatrix} a & b & c & d & e \end{pmatrix}
× \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ x \\ x^2 \\ x^3 \\ x^4 \end{pmatrix} \)

You arrived at set \(\displaystyle E\) by eliminating coefficients \(\displaystyle a\) and \(\displaystyle b\):

\(\displaystyle E = \begin{pmatrix} c & d & e \end {pmatrix} ×
\begin{pmatrix} -1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}
× \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ x \\ x^2 \\ x^3 \\ x^4 \end{pmatrix} \)

The difference in what I did was to eliminate the highest-power coefficients, \(\displaystyle e\) and \(\displaystyle f\):

\(\displaystyle E = \begin{pmatrix} a & b & c \end {pmatrix} ×
\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}
× \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ x \\ x^2 \\ x^3 \\ x^4 \end{pmatrix} \)

Either should work. AGAIN, you have to check my work! It is too easy to make typos.
 
Okay, I think I got it now.
The "vectors" (can we really talk about vectors here ? or just polynomials forming a basis ?) are (x2-x4),(x-x3),(1-x²).

It tallies with what DrPhil posted to explain.
So if I understood correctly, (x2-1),(x3-x),(x4-1) is also another basis.

Thanks to both of you !

And yes, I did check your work DrPhil. Thanks again !
 
IThe only way I was taught to find them was replacing that way : (a,b,c,d,e) = (-c-e,-d,c,d,e) = c*(-1,0,1,0,0) + d*(0,-1,0,1,0) + e*(-1,0,0,0,1)
This is essentially correct in your originally post. The subset E exists in the 5-dimensional space P4. Since there are two constraints, it requires only 3 basis vectors to span E, but those basis vectors have 5 elements representing coefficients of 5 powers of x. Thus I would consider the three 5-vectors to be an adequate representation.

When you write the basis set as three polynomials, such as either
{(x2-x4), (x-x3), (1-x²)} or {(x2-1), (x3-x), (x4-1)},
note that all basis polynomials are divisible by (1-x2), so any linear combination is also divisible by (1-x2). That statement embodies the two constraints.

Enjoy :p !
 
This is essentially correct in your originally post. The subset E exists in the 5-dimensional space P4. Since there are two constraints, it requires only 3 basis vectors to span E, but those basis vectors have 5 elements representing coefficients of 5 powers of x. Thus I would consider the three 5-vectors to be an adequate representation.

When you write the basis set as three polynomials, such as either
{(x2-x4), (x-x3), (1-x²)} or {(x2-1), (x3-x), (x4-1)},
note that all basis polynomials are divisible by (1-x2), so any linear combination is also divisible by (1-x2). That statement embodies the two constraints.

Enjoy :p !

Actually I'm still not convinced
Let's take the derivative of a+bt+ct²+dt^3+et^4
it gives b+2ct+3dt²+4et^3
now let F be polynomials such as P4'(1)=0 and P4'(-1)=0
we have b+2c+3d+4e=0, b-2c+3d-4e=0, <=> b+3d=0 and c+2e=0 so that's (b,c,d,e)=(-3d, -2e, d, e)=d*(-3,0,1,0) + e*(0,-2,0,1)
so (x²-3),(x^3-2x) is a basis.
too bad (x²-3) is not divisible by (x²-1) !
 
Last edited:
Actually I'm still not convinced
Let's take the derivative of a+bt+ct²+dt^3+et^4
it gives b+2ct+3dt²+4et^3
now let F be polynomials such as P4'(1)=0 and P4'(-1)=0
we have b+2c+3d+4e=0, b-2c+3d-4e=0, <=> b+3d=0 and c+2e=0 so that's (b,c,d,e)=(-3d, -2e, d, e)=d*(-3,0,1,0) + e*(0,-2,0,1)
so (x²-3),(x^3-2x) is a basis.
too bad (x²-3) is not divisible by (x²-1) !
Is this the same problem?
Taking the derivative does nothing to help find basis vectors for the set.
You do not know the values of the derivative at 1 or at -1.
 
Top