joey_junior
New member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 2
Why is the product rule used when finding the partial derivative (with respect to a variable) when e is in the function? I noticed it's usually treated as a separate function within a function.
For example, I'm trying to find z't(x,y) when z = ex^2 + y2exy with x = 2t + 3s and y = t2s3
I've found the correct partial derivatives with respect to x, as well as both for t, but apparently the partial derivative of z with respect to y is 2yexy + xy2exy. They've clearly broke y2exy down into two separate functions; (y2) and (exy) and differentiated using product rule, but I don't know why, as my textbook does a poor job of showing the proof. It just seems so arbitrary. So basically I'm just wondering why this is the case, and what I should look for when trying to spot when to use the product rule when finding the partial derivatives of variables in similar functions. Thank you.
For example, I'm trying to find z't(x,y) when z = ex^2 + y2exy with x = 2t + 3s and y = t2s3
I've found the correct partial derivatives with respect to x, as well as both for t, but apparently the partial derivative of z with respect to y is 2yexy + xy2exy. They've clearly broke y2exy down into two separate functions; (y2) and (exy) and differentiated using product rule, but I don't know why, as my textbook does a poor job of showing the proof. It just seems so arbitrary. So basically I'm just wondering why this is the case, and what I should look for when trying to spot when to use the product rule when finding the partial derivatives of variables in similar functions. Thank you.