let u(t)=<−tsint,t,t2/3 and v(t)=<−tsint,cos2t,−t1/3>
Compute d/dt(u(t).v(t))
Taking the dot product i have:
tsint2(t)+tcos2(t)−t=0
From here i think i see a trig identity but not sure what to do with the t in front of cos, sin.
So, we will proceed with another route!
Remove whats common t . The negative 1 comes from -t from moving whats common.
t(cos2(t)−1+sin2(t))=0
So now i have
t=0 and cos2(t)−1+sin2(t)=0
wolfram said that this was an identity but i could not verify that!
cos2(t)−1=1−sin2(t)
plugging in the identity for cos^2(t) we have
1−sin2(t)−1+sin2(t)=0
Therefore, t=0 and 0=0
making the derivative 0?
However, i never took the derivative and i couldn't verify the identity.
Right after i take the dot product could i move the -t to the right and divide out the other t?
then use the cos^2 + sin^2 = 1 identity? then take the derivative?
Where did i go wrong?
Compute d/dt(u(t).v(t))
Taking the dot product i have:
tsint2(t)+tcos2(t)−t=0
From here i think i see a trig identity but not sure what to do with the t in front of cos, sin.
So, we will proceed with another route!
Remove whats common t . The negative 1 comes from -t from moving whats common.
t(cos2(t)−1+sin2(t))=0
So now i have
t=0 and cos2(t)−1+sin2(t)=0
wolfram said that this was an identity but i could not verify that!
cos2(t)−1=1−sin2(t)
plugging in the identity for cos^2(t) we have
1−sin2(t)−1+sin2(t)=0
Therefore, t=0 and 0=0
making the derivative 0?
However, i never took the derivative and i couldn't verify the identity.
Right after i take the dot product could i move the -t to the right and divide out the other t?
then use the cos^2 + sin^2 = 1 identity? then take the derivative?
Where did i go wrong?
Last edited: