i don't understand this notation

cotfw

New member
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Messages
30
I was reading through a book and it wrote this:

(a,b) + (c,d) = (a+c,b+d)

I don't understand this though. How can number pairs be added together as if they are values
 
I was reading through a book and it wrote this:

(a,b) + (c,d) = (a+c,b+d)

I don't understand this though. How can number pairs be added together as if they are values

It is simply a matter of definitions.

Define multiplication as: \(\displaystyle (a,b) \cdot (c,d) = (ac - bd,ad + bc)\)
 
I still don't understand
Those two operations are absolutely standard. They are the ways we define addition and multiplication in the field of the complex numbers. You may not be mathematically mature enough to appreciate the definitions.
 
pka is assuming that your (a, b) represents the complex number a+ bi. We add complex numbers by adding the real parts and the imaginary parts: (a+ bi)+ (c+ di)= (a+ c)+ (b+ d)i. Using (a, b) to represent a+ bi and (c, d) to represent c+ di, that would be the same as (a, b)+ (c, d)= (a+ c, b+ d).

But perhaps you intend (a, b) to represent the vector ai+ bj, a vector with component along the x-axis equal to a and component along the y-axis equal to b (here, i is the unit vector in the x-direction, j the unit vector in the y-direction). In that case, we add "component wise", adding the x components together and adding the y components together: (a+ bi)+ (c+ di)= (a+ c)+ (b+d)ix. Again, if we represent a+ bi by (a, b) and c+ di by (c, d), that is the same as (a, b)+ (c, d)= (a+ b, c+ d).

The only real difference between "complex numbers" and "two dimensional vectors" is that there is a product defined on complex numbers that is not defined on vectors.
 
pka is assuming that your (a, b) represents the complex number a+ bi. We add complex numbers by adding the real parts and the imaginary parts: (a+ bi)+ (c+ di)= (a+ c)+ (b+ d)i. Using (a, b) to represent a+ bi and (c, d) to represent c+ di, that would be the same as (a, b)+ (c, d)= (a+ c, b+ d).

But perhaps you intend (a, b) to represent the vector ai+ bj, a vector with component along the x-axis equal to a and component along the y-axis equal to b (here, i is the unit vector in the x-direction, j the unit vector in the y-direction). In that case, we add "component wise", adding the x components together and adding the y components together: (a+ bi)+ (c+ di)= (a+ c)+ (b+d)ix. Again, if we represent a+ bi by (a, b) and c+ di by (c, d), that is the same as (a, b)+ (c, d)= (a+ b, c+ d).

The only real difference between "complex numbers" and "two dimensional vectors" is that there is a product defined on complex numbers that is not defined on vectors.

Thank you that was very helpful
 
pka is assuming that your (a, b) represents the complex number a+ bi. We add complex numbers by adding the real parts and the imaginary parts: (a+ bi)+ (c+ di)= (a+ c)+ (b+ d)i. Using (a, b) to represent a+ bi and (c, d) to represent c+ di, that would be the same as (a, b)+ (c, d)= (a+ c, b+ d).

But perhaps you intend (a, b) to represent the vector ai+ bj, a vector with component along the x-axis equal to a and component along the y-axis equal to b (here, i is the unit vector in the x-direction, j the unit vector in the y-direction). In that case, we add "component wise", adding the x components together and adding the y components together: (a+ bi)+ (c+ di)= (a+ c)+ (b+d)ix. Again, if we represent a+ bi by (a, b) and c+ di by (c, d), that is the same as (a, b)+ (c, d)= (a+ b, c+ d).

The only real difference between "complex numbers" and "two dimensional vectors" is that there is a product defined on complex numbers that is not defined on vectors.

Just to add to the discussion (not to contradict anything):

However, vectors have two types of vector-products defined.

Though, vector division is not defined.
 
Since the original post and the previous response said nothing about "multiplication" or "division" I don't see how that "adds" anything to the discussion.
 
Top